What amazes me is this guy with obvious anger issues along with a whiny voice has been able to convince some money people he is presidential timber.
Debate prep should be fun.
Immaturity is such a wonderful attribute for a Presidential contender.
Dude, you know they record these things, right? That there is objective evidence? That you have already screwed yourself into the ground on this issue, and you can make all the counter claims you want to make, but the clear facts show you to be a misogynist as well as a liar?
The world doesnāt hold enough popcorn.
āEditorializing.ā I have to give it to him, that is a pretty good one for evading questions that state his prior positions. And it sounds a bit smarter than the Sarah Palin favorite ātrick question.ā
ā¦particularly if itās a hostile interviewer and so I do think that interviews should be questions and not necessarily editorializing."
Rand is hilarious.
And toast.
If the Republican nominating process were a horror movieāand in any way that counts it isāRand would certainly be the whiny, irritating, and borderline hysterical character who you know will get killed off in about the first 11 minutes of the flick.
Gosh, the campaign is going swimmingly!
Donāt piss off those folks who buy pixels by the barrel, sonny. It wonāt end well.
Has he, though?
Convinced money people that heās presidential timber?
I wonder if he has one of these in red?
Heās dead, Jim.
NO ONE WANTS a BIG JERK! in White House! He belongs in the NUT HOUSE!!!
Seriously, I believe Rand thinks this make him look macho and manly when in reality he looks like a prissy dick.
IMO.
Rand uses āeditorializingā to be a bad thing, because āliberalā media.
Come on down, Kentucky newspapers.
Look, Iām a dick. There, I said it. And Iāve got a lot of crazy things out there that Iāve been recorded on tape saying that I have to answer for that I donāt want to actually answer for. Iām not that hard to understand, I just want people to vote for me despite all the nutty-wacko-half-thought-out nonsense Iāve been saying over the years leading up to this. Iām not that hard to understandā¦
Like I said. Toast.
Maybe Iām a cynic, but Iām pretty sure that this is the best he could make of the situation. Heās got a campaign adviser somewhere telling him, āRand, youāre running against Hillary and youāve come across as a jerk to TWO female members of the media. How the f*ck do you think thatās going to play in the general?ā
And thus, some poor AP guy got shouted at in order to balance the scales.
The way future interviews for Rand should go would be like this:
Interviewer: āI donāt want to āeditorializeā here, so Iām just going to play this tape and ask you to explain what you meant when you said it, and what your position is today.ā
Show the tape of Rand saying the moon landing was faked or whatever, and then let him talk. Then show the tape again. Repeat until heās no longer a candidate.
Well that is certainly a trait we need to have as POTUS, a hot-headed jerk.
I think confidence is actually something of which he has rather more than is warranted. In Paulworld, heās The Chosen One, destined to restore Americaās pre-Progressive-Era glory. He reeks of entitlement and self-regard ā thinks heās the smartest guy ever born (a trait he shares with many libertarians), somebody who found it eminently appropriate to create his own fking medical board to certify his very special qualifications, whitesplains the history of the Republican Party to Howard students, and sees any question other than āwonāt you please honor us by sharing your wisdom?ā as effrontery. Heās an arrogant dauphin, and delusional into the bargain ā as much about himself as about any of Alex Jonesā fantasies.