Discussion for article #237233
I don’t care if he was armed with a flame thrower. Again at close range and having the decided “fire power” advantage, rather than knee-capping or winging someone, they shoot to kill though, in this case, the officers were really not in any physical danger.
1 Like
Not that I’d give anyone involved in acts like this credit for a surplus of brains, but…
Congratulations, guys. You just handed the mic to possibly the one person whose shrieking harpiness made her a caricature. Worse: you gave her credibility.
Pam will be watching this like a horny teen watches porn.
Unlike a horny teen, though, La Geller will have personal staying power.
Cops shoot to kill and do, leaving no live witness then have the same old justification that everyone is supposed to swallow whole.
If you listen to the cops version of things, they are always right and always justified, yet incidence after incidence and video after video, that notion is patently horseshit.
The cops getting the benefit of doubt is a thing of the past and they are doing this to themselves.
This dead guy sounds like a dude on a bad mission but the cops story sounds like typical designed to be justifiable and unprosecutable horseshit. Doubt is what is justified.
?? The family said he was shot in the back. What is clear in the video is the cops are backing away, and he is coming at them. Looks like the old suicide by cop, the latest trend for losers.
No witnesses? They were in a crowded parking lot next to a crowded road. What on earth are you talking about?