I wonder large Jimmy is living on the donations of others?
Indeed. Most right-wingers harbor exaggerated fears about what the world is like, and that drives their political opinions. Theyāre all pants-wetters.
It is a complete lack of empathy. Conservatives are completely unable to understand how other people may feel about something. This is why whenever a conservative tries to explain someone elseās motives he can only project his own. He/she only knows what they would do in such a situation and so can only project their own values and proclivities. Conservatism can be succinctly defined as an endless search for a perfect justification for selfishness.
Interesting article. Thanks.
Gentlemen, we have the technology. We have the capability to make the worldās first bionic face puncher. We can build a robot arm which will hold the entire body of Donald Trump, Jr and bash him into the face of Martin Shkreli, Tom Cotton, or any other deserving target.
Donāt forget Richard Spencer then. I think heās made to be punched in the face.
No matter how often or how hard he tries, he will never, ever succeed.
I was speaking metaforically, of course⦠
What about Hannity?
Iāve never heard a better description. Thank you.
Itās a paraphrase of a famous line by the economist John Kenneth Galbraith:
Conservatism is the latest in manās endless search to justify his greed.
I keep hoping so. Is it true?
Depends. If Ms. Phillips made any attempt to induce someone to pay her, or to invest in her non-existent business, thatās easy - itās fraud.
Itās a founding principle: Greed is good! Itās what capitalism is all about.
@tena is correct. It is shamelessly lifted from the remarks by John Kenneth Galbraith.
The quotation is:
The modern conservative is engaged in one of manās oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
āStop the Madness,ā Interview with Rupert Cornwell, Toronto Globe and Mail (6 July 2002) (see http://wist.info/galbraith-john-kenneth/7463/ )
Whoops. Wrong time period. It took OāKeefe and his minions nearly FOUR MONTHS to try and infiltrate the Washington Post and they went all in with Brenda Starr here.
What kind of āvictoryā is getting somebody at WAPO with (presumably) no inside knowledge of Muellerās ongoing investigation to say that there is no conclusive proof that Trump colluded with Russia (yet)?
Project Veritasā¦please take noteā¦one downā¦Nixonā¦one to goā¦Trump. The WaPo is no neophyte, just saying.
To the tune of $320k/year, iirc.