Discussion for article #225499
That 44% that said Obamacare hasnât helped anyone are the problem in this country today. Theyâve got theirs and are either indifferent or hostile to those who donât. I work with a conservative Republican who pretty much hates government, libruls and taxes, but doesnât hesitate to tell me about all the entitlements she accesses on a daily basis for her daughter who has a learning disability. There is a big disconnect in a lot of peoplesâ brains that causes them to act and think in a blindly self-interested manner. Shorter version: you canât fix stupid.
About time someone looked for the âObamacare doesnât go far enoughâ responses in the âDisapproveâ side.
Shh ⌠Don;t tell FOX abut this poll. Heads will explode.
And that always leaves such a mess.
I wouldnât call this stupid so much as selfish. Selfish people with the âI got mineâ attitude are frequently (unfortunately) not stupid.
Except that ALL insurance plans are better now. Never has so much benefit been smuggled into peopleâs lives without them even having a clue.
According to 44 percent of respondents, Obamacare had not helped anyone.
RiiiiiightâŚInsurance premiums have stabilized over the last couple of years, you canât be denied health coverage due to pre-existing conditions, more standard care for women and childrenâŚAll this and more, brought to you byâŚ
BENGHAZI!!!
I certainly hope you mention that whenever she brings it up. You know, in a helpful âyou should be more self reliantâ way that the GOTP addresses the rest of the US.
Your logic can actually apply to both sides of the argument. Many people who support the acting of taking from one group in order to fund the government to pay for the benefits of others, yet they donât volunteer, via charitable donations, to support non-governmental organizations that provide for the very same people.
Just look at the entertainment industry, elected officials, sports stars, business CEOs, etc⌠who support increasing taxes on the âwealthyâ yet donât see any hypocrisy in using every loophole to avoid paying more taxes and give very little of the incredible wealth to organizations who are helping the very people who they claim need assistance.
So there is hypocrisy on both sides and not just on the conservative side of the debate.
Wouldnât that create janitorial jobs?
I think itâs less accurate to call them âstupidâ (though that may also be true) and more accurate to call them âliars.â As in, no matter what this president does, it ainât good enough or itâs just plain bad.
I disagreeâselfishness is an expression of monumental stupidity, which is not always related to intelligence level.
âBut 17 percent said they disapproved because the law is not liberal enough.â
Did CNN used the word liberal or TPM? What a catchphrase for single payer utilized by the rest of the civilized world.
America.
Chock-full of morons.
The more positive and correct way to view the results is:
âthat 57% (40+17) are in favor of government involvement in health insurance; and
âthat, at most, 42% (59-17) are opposed, or at least are opposed if itâs called Obamacare.
No brains. No mess.
THANK YOU!! Thatâs a point Iâve been trying to make with all these Obama/Obamacare haters for four years! A lot of people are unhappy because thereâs no public option or because itâs not single payer. No one ever seems to mention that.
Liberal media, my a$$.
lolwut?
I would like to agree with you. In the sense that selfish people are typically short-sighted, and fail to see the long term implications of their actions, I do agree with you.
But selfish people can be very clever in achieving their short-term goals. They can often think quite effectively in achieving their goals. The Republicans, for one example, are quite clever in their strategies for obstructing Obamacare. We dismiss them as âstupidâ at our peril.
Nah. If CNN could spin this poll as TERRIBLE NEWS!!! FOR OBAMA!!! (and oh, they so did), just think what Fox can do, freed as they are from the surly bonds of objective reality.