Discussion for article #243283
Where’s the charge for intent to commit an act of terrorism? His actions were meant to frighten people to the point where they would no longer pursue an entirely legal healthcare procedure, killing was just the method he used to instill the fear.
2 Likes
Interesting. Sounds like he may be more than just a lone wolf loony if “additional suspects” may be arrested and property searches occur. it also sounds like he did not present as insane or likely to argue insanity as a defense, but we’ll see I suppose. This entire investigation and prosecution is suspect in my mind because of how deeply conservative the area is.
3 Likes
Well, at least we know who will play him in the TV Movie: Nick Nolte.
1 Like
He really looks like a tranny leftist, doesn’t he? (Ted Cruz’s take.)
This dumbass needs to be charged federally with domestic terrorism:
18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism”:
“Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
18 U.S.C. § 2332b defines the term “federal crime of terrorism” as an offense that:
Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and
Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).