Discussion for article #222749
Are those photos supposed to convey the sense that everybody is stunned? I see a lot of people standing - does that count?
Jill I beg of you, please. please, take David Brooks and Maureen Dowd with you. Brooks has been useless for year but Modo and her descent into Peggy Noonan like Post-Menopausal “celebrity curmudgeon” is truly embarrassing.
Looks just like the TPM newsroom without a nap room
Oddly enough, the stunned NY Times newsroom looks no different than the usual NY Times newsroom. Or perhaps that’s not so odd…
Stunning photographs.
Who is Jill Abramson? She never worked here.
I’ve been through several ceo changes, and buy-outs and sell-outs, and etc. So this is one of those stories where the reporter might be required to explain his superlatives, so I understand what the story is.
Stunned, as in: …“pining for the fjords” …“shagged out after a long squawk.”
And Friedman and Cohen and Bruni and . . .
Agreed. I liked David better when I cursed his name every time I read his column. Lately it’s just not worth the effort… I can’t even get mad at his strange ramblings lately.
At least Ross gives me the intellectual challenge of finding the hole in his logic.
Red staircase. Red staircase close-up. Red staircase, slightly different angle. One pic of guy holding microphone in front of red staircase. Sorry…not much to see here, unless you’re really into red staircases. Stunned? Not conveyed in these pics!
There are times when this site turns into a gossip rag. This article is one such example.
I’m thinking that the NY Times might have a Susan G. Koman Race for the Cure moment.
If it is true that this is a disagreement over equal pay for a woman who was being paid less than the man who previously held the position, look out. This could get interesting.