Discussion for article #226117
It was a N.Y. Times report on Iraq after all…that should have been a dead giveaway
You dismiss reporting from the newspaper of record for this country in an offhand manner as if Drudge were reporting it. Being blase isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/middleeast/obama-weighs-military-strikes-to-aid-trapped-iraqis-officials-say.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=Banner&module=span-ab-top-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news[quote=“TopCat, post:2, topic:8161”]
I know this marks me down as a cranky old codger, but I am disappointed to see a Rear Admiral making announcements via Twitter.
Even with my ucla education I know the difference between had airstrikes and authorized airstrikes; one would indicate a passed act, the other gives permission for a potential act. The iraq war cheerleading squad…er…ny times should not be trusted on iraq ever again. they bombed them with food and water??? please tell me you were kidding.