We still have no guarantee. The goalpost has moved a bit with the printing extension. What kind of nefariousness will result in letting the question still appear?
What about the Gerrymandering decision Madame Speaker ? That one is now on the books.
Really? When?
āIt would be a sad occurrence if people said, āwell, since thatās on there, Iām not going to be counted.ā Because it means so much in terms of who we are as a nation in terms of what makes up America and who we are and how we address the needs of the American people.ā
Sorry, but this is pathetic.
What do you think sheās supposed to do about it?
No, but this opinion opens the way to the Maryland case driving a stake through itās heart, at least until 2030.
Iām amazed that more people havenāt picked up on that.
Commerce testified they could move the printing deadline to Oct 31, 2019. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/dc/supreme-court-census-citizenship-decision
The printing date is now October. It had been August, no? That was the whole reason for trying to rush this through, as I recall.
It had been Monday next week. There has been no announcement yet the deadline has been moved, just testimony that it was possible to move it at additional cost.
Point out that Congress has the constitutional authority to regulate the ātimes, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives,ā that politically motivated gerrymandering affects the manner in which elections are conducted, and she is ordering the relevant committees to begin formulating legislation to remedy the state sanctioned corruption of elections.
You have more confidence in the USSC than I. A Court that can find the citizenship question does not violate the enumeration clause despite expert testimony that it will have exactly that effect can surely find a reason why it doesnāt violate the equal protection clause either.
Weak tea. Perhaps she wasnāt expecting company?
Iāve been a Pelosi defender, but this really could have been a much stronger statement.
Because half-empty is more fun.
Sorry? You should be.
Youāre comment couldāve been more supportive of the leader of the Democratic party. 'Cause all we got on the other side is a misanthropic racist.
Hope, wishful thinkingā¦ what is she smoking.
I am convinced that Shirley Chisolm was right.
Remind me?
