Discussion: Paul Ryan: Some Freedom Caucus Members Are Voting For Repeal Bill

Please proceed asshole
Your epitaph will read:
Town Halls? what town halls?
democratic plants indeed

4 Likes

Ryan noted that some members of the Freedom Caucus have already voted for the bill in committee, and said that additions to the bill, like the ability for governor’s to impose work requirements on some Medicaid recipients, had wooed additional conservative members.

And the WORSE the bill gets due to the teabaggers venality, the more likely it dies OR eventually dies when it gets to the Senate. Mission not accomplished.

4 Likes

Republicans are especially well suited to inflicting pain and misery on the populace. Why in the hell they’re having such difficulties enacting a fresh round of hair shirt treatments is puzzling.

3 Likes

It’s the memory of those very town halls that’s giving some House members second thoughts. There’s no way we can retake the Senate but some liberals seem to think that Dems can win some House seats in ‘18 along with governors’ mansions in certain states.

The touted unanimity Democrats claim in the Senate in opposition to the AHCA is likely shakier than presented. Joe Manchin for one is registered in the wrong party for all intents and purposes. Claire McCaskill and Heidi Heitkamp may be looking more at their next election than at national policy battles. Don’t be surprised if a handful of Dem defections push this through in the Senate.

with the following result…

1 Like

Hypocrisy is forged in ironic iron today.

This comes down to it for the Freedom cockels…

Will they abandon their vague notions of fiscal restraint based on 19th century robber barron benefits, and join the recalcitrant right in their anti-progress hatefest?

Most of us know the answer. Intense hate towards any perceived progress in social justice, especially fiscal equity, is really the root of their political instinct. Fiscal conservatism was just another convenient label that rang nice in the amygdala…

What is most disgusting is just how transparent their shift will be. Just more proof their only real conviction is hate.

1 Like

“If senators can make improvements to this bill, without jeopardizing what we call the Byrd Rule, meaning a filibuster, that’s great. We want them to improve this bill if they can,” Ryan told Hannity.

Will no one rid me of this meddlesome bill?

So Eddie Munster may sneak this through the House, only to find an actual wall in the Senate, and find that karma is an elderly bitch with a per-existing condition just in time for the 2018 mid-terms…

3 Likes

Funny how fast things changed from “This is the bill, we have to pass it as is” to open season for any amendments that might get enough votes.

5 Likes

you say it as if it’s something to be proud of Pauli Boi…

I am not particularly surprised. It was quite clear that Ryan was going to have to move the bill in one direction or the other (that was actually one of its biggest criticisms…it was just a hodge podge of crap with no ideological direction and as such, nobody supported it from either side). And of course Ryan took the right leaning path…its where his heart is and he is more concerned about the Freedom Caucus folks making his life a living hell.

The scuttlebutt from the FC folks last night however was he didn’t change it enough (we’ve heard that song before) and they still won’t pass it…and of course, by making this right turn, he lost some more members of the “coverage” caucus, while ensuring its deader than dead in the Senate.

The provision allowing insurance companies to charge 20% if people drop insurance for 60 days, will almost certainly run afoul of the Byrd Rule. And without any penalty/mandate…their simply is workable model for insurance companies. The CBO will have to run another analysis, and that one will make the 24 million losing their insurance analysis look like a day in the park. The premium rate hikes that will be necessary to cover pre-existing conditions with no requirement to actually get insurance from younger/healthier people will drive millions from even employer based insurance plans.

I am standing by my earlier skepticism; this doesn’t get out of the House, let alone the Senate.

3 Likes

Why do I have this uneasy feeling this is going to be another ‘Medicare part D’ fiasco where they torture the votes out of members by browbeating them and hold them for hours until they screamed ‘Uncle!’?

1 Like

Manchin seems to be a weird cat, but it would be dumb for any Democrat to support the bill. Republicans WILL use the vote against them; they will blame all the bad stuff about Trumpcare on the Democrats, and such votes would, not without reason, erode the support of Democratic voters. Voting for Trumpcare is a suckers game.

1 Like

I’ve spoken with a lot of Freedom caucus member who are voting for it," Ryan told Fox News’ Sean Hannity

Define “a lot”, Ryan. There are 42 members of the house freedumb caucus so what’s the count?

“A lot” of people in my home think I’m the smartest person living here. However, “a lot” of people in my home think that they’re the smartest person.

There are 2 people living in our home…

2 Likes

It seems the combination of Trump’s insanity and “useful idiot” status for the Republican Congress may result in almost every single piece of legislation coming out of committees being odious dog turds on the pavement in the eyes of Democratic voters. Both houses of Congress, the Presidency and SCOTUS in their control hardly seems a paradigm ripe for Republicans to feel the need to cater to Dem concerns, either those of the Dem reps or their constituents. Do Dems spend four years taking the position every yay vote on a Republican initiative is participating in a sucker’s game? How long can leadership dictate to the caucus siding with the GOP on anything is a bad decision Senators and Representative are best loathe to do?

Isn’t this how swamps are built, not drained?

GOP leaders pile on sweeteners to sell Obamacare repeal

The revisions are part of a last-ditch effort to get the measure passed.

3 Likes

It’s so hard to read. I could see this passing the House by the slimmest of margins, but then I could also see him halting the vote when it’s clear it won’t make it over the line. More than anything, though, I just don’t see the point of this exercise. How can we have a Speaker of the House who’s equal parts stubborn and clueless, but also incredibly weak?

1 Like

You are certainly right about the Byrd rule. I hope you are also right about the bill not getting out of the House. But it seems to me - I hope I am wrong - that the DNC is “absent without leave” on all this. Why are they not up with ads and social media on this bill? Why are they not up with “news reports” from every nursing home in the gettable Republican districts? Where are the ads with hospital administrators and nurses about the economic devastation to their communities? Why have they not brought back Harry and Louise? Calling Tom Perez and Congressman Ellison. Where the hell are you? What the hell are you waiting for?

1 Like