Discussion for article #242268
It must have been insecure. He said it and he’s a Republican so that makes it true.
“Clinton should be disqualified because there’s no valid way we could defeat her.”
"Mr. Pataki, do you know what an email server is?
Why yes, it’s the teenage intern us politicos have to hire to Tweeter and Facebeek for us. An having an unsecure intern can literally bring down the US Government!"
And excuse me, what’s your name Sir?
She should have been using an AOL account.
Moderator: What makes you think she’s disqualified?
Pataki: Well, she turned the country into a newt!
Moderator: A newt?
Pataki:[meekly after a long pause]… It got better.
Crowd:[shouts]Disqualify her anyway!
The internets are a strange, difficult thing to understand.
So during 9/11, the planning to invade Iraq and the Iraq War Secretary of State Colin Powell used a COMMERCIAL E-MAIL ACCOUNT. What do you think of that, Pataki?
Cue the Constitution of the United States (since Pataki obviously hasn’t read it). Doesn’t seem to be anything about using secure email servers in the list of qualifications…
Qualifications for the Office of President
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 - ratified February 27, 1951
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Clinton should be disqualified because her email server caused the Runaway Blimp.
Remember when that old dead guy form Alaska said something about the internet being composed of " a series of tubes?" He taught this guy everything he knows about the internet.
"“We have no doubt that that was hacked”
Actually, we have no EVIDENCE that that was hacked. Given the depth with which that server has been examined, I would say it is virtually certain it was NOT hacked.
…And what are you doing at the undercard table?
I could care less about Pataki but I was just now blown away by Toady Todd on tonight’s NBC news announcing what will be the three headline takeaways tomorrow from this debate…which btw, needless to say, hasn’t happened yet.
This fucker is telling people what the press has already determined its going to use as preplanned fodder for their contrived narrative. The stories for tomorrow will obviously be independent of whatever happens tonight in this debate if he’s already announcing what he says will be the focus. I find that astonishingly arrogant, presumptuous and dense.
Why the fuck have a debate then Chucky, if you already have your stupid narrative? One was Rubio vs. Bush. The other two were similarly concocted narratives and honestly I can’t recall the specifics. Something about tRump v. Carson of course. And the third headline…who knows. OOoops.
“Clinton and her running mate should be impeached before the election and Paul Ryan succeed to the presidency.”
Who? Oooooohhh! OK! I do remember when he announced his run for POTUS. Virtually every person in America took to the streets, setting fires, overturning cars, shooting bullets into the air, and creating general mayhem as news spread that Curious George had officially entered the 2016 Republican presidential primary race. PATAKIMENTUM was epic!
With his head soooo’ far up his ass, I still don’t see how George was able to throw his hat in the ring for president.
Not even the Runaway Blimp can derail “The Narrative”.
Step away from Chuck Todd. Unclean!
But the burning question of the day is: “How can we prevent any more Runaway Blimps?”