Discussion for article #239540
Yeah, because what Trump’s lawyer friends think obviously “trumps” the Constitution. Wow, what ignorance. And it really does not get much more un-American than to stomp on the Constitution when you do not like what it contains.
When O’Reilly is the voice of reason in a discussion you know the other person is a frickin’ loon.
I’m pretty sure that asking an awkward question qualifies as “not treating [him] well.” This means he can do a third party run.
I challenge Trump to conduct a survey of licensed attorneys to see if “most lawyers” support his position. I would be surprised if it got even 5% support.
Wall isn’t doable either.
Only a matter of time before Trump goes on the offensive and writes O’Reilly off as an idiot.
You could possibly build it (after years of court cases by locals who will hate looking at it, and by animal lovers and environmentalists), but it won’t work. El Chapo will tunnel under it. Mexico won’t pay for it, nor will Trump’s idea of visa fees for Mexicans (you know how many $100 fees you would need to make $ 50 billion?) do more than scratch the surface. Huge boondoggle for government contractors (maybe Trump companies?).
If they wanted to do a better WSA type project I’d rather they worked on our infrasturcture rather than another huge Trump vanity project.
It seems Trump is relying on Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for legal advice.
Two nitwits.
“I’d much rather find out whether or not anchor babies are actually citizens,” he said.
Psst…one is running for President, and is currently governor of Louisiana. So its already been found out.
not much of a grilling… more like toasting a marshmallow when you’re making S’mors and don’t want a blackened 'mallow…
These two seem so much alike, pompous, white, ass holes.
Well, now lets do a little thought experiment here. Trump gets his Mexican wall built. Now how will he address another 3,000 mile porous border where illegals can still slip into the country?
Can you say, “Maginot Line” boys and girls?
The idea of blocking illegal immigration with a wall is a total fantasy 40 percent of Mexican Immigrants are illegal because they over stayed their visas. They came here legally, to work then decided they did not want to go back. A wall had nothing to do with it, and that is only one problem. There are many more that make whole idea a very expensive joke
Imagine the “opening ceremony” for THE WALL with Trump selling tickets for a Pink Floyd concert…
Except even in this, O’Reilly isn’t exactly the voice of reason. This is the usual FOX tendency to say one thing in one place and say another in another. When attacking whomever they don’t like, FOX will literally contradict itself.
The reality is that we could deport every illegal immigrant and undocumented worker in this country if we didn’t mind jacking taxes way up so that we could pay for all the people doing the work and didn’t mind our crops rotting in the fields.
If there’s one thing Trump epitomizes it’s the GOP tendency to deny any inconvenient fact with a wild, baseless assertion pulled out of the air, to put it mildly. Everything this guy says about the world is similar to that “Many lawyers are saying…” remark—there’s no basis for saying it at all, he’s just making it up because he wishes it were so and in his mind that makes it so. It’s part of being a blowhard tycoon who won’t take “no” for an answer. Running for President may be the first time in decades he’s had to deal with objective reality in a sustained way. I think that’s a big part of what’s so morbidly fascinating about all this—watching a person so detached from reality trying to cope with the world outside his bubble.
Of course, the actual, big “The Wall” concert was done when the world was tearing down a wall in Berlin. And its what happens in the end of the Pink Floyd album too.
Here is a song I think catches the movement behind Trump MUCH better