Discussion: Oregon Town Watches Warily As Armed Protesters Take Over Wildlife Refuge

Most people are ignorant of all the facts in this saga. The Oregonian newspaper has a very comprehensive story about the Hammond ordeal: http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2015/12/ranchers_fight_with_feds_spark.html
After reading it, I have mixed feelings about the case.I think the militia and the Bundys should go home, The Hammonds have always paid their grazing fees. They have also paid an additional $400,000 in fines.They are not Bundys. Before you form an opinion, read The Oregonian story. The article also has some background photos.

2 Likes

I do think that most people in the area are actually sympathetic to the protesters but not how they are doing it. This is basically armed insurrection and should not be tolerated. And really, even the general point made by the townspeople (some), is one sided.

Sure, it is jobs for some people and they lose them with protecting areas, or at least restrict some of them. However, it is not like there are not other issues or no benefit from these sorts of things. It is one reason this sort of thing should be a federal choice and not that of a State. Some states would be happy to burn their forests to the ground if it suited their short term economic needs.

4 Likes

Armed protesters…Yes we must be very careful how we refer to these domestic terrorists, after all they are white. {{Rolls eyes}}

8 Likes

My fav’ Winded Warrior thus far: “Captain Moroni”…Oh yeah! It’s a Mormon YeeHawd’ now!

[One of the protesters, who gave the name “Captain Moroni,” guarded the entrance to the refuge Sunday. “Moroni” said he was disappointed that more protesters did not arrive after a widespread call on social media. …The man identifying as Captain Moroni said he was inspired by the call, and that the inspiration was validated by God in the form of a flock of geese he saw flying.
“I just knew it was the right thing [to come to Oregon],” Captain Moroni said. “I’m willing to die here.”]

WooHoo! Add a lil’ batshitcrazy theology to the anti-BigGummit’ ConNuts…and it’s a party!
The way these Welfare Cowboys are being pilloried across social media, and even by locals in the area, had they one shred of common decency and social awareness they would tuck their tiny tails between their legs and crawl back under their (Twitter take) PusseCommontatis’ rock.

9 Likes

These squatters of prone to violence if threatened, or at least want authorities to believe it. They’re heavily armed zealots that the Feds have to consider dangerous if provoked. Bundy may very well like nothing more than another Waco to ignite (he thinks) some sort of cascading series of events that get a lot of Federal agents killed and anit-government forces united to become more aggressive.These guys want to be the John Browns of the fall of the government, to be written about in future textbooks as provoking the start of a new form of Federal-State relationship.
The Feds can block food and supplies from entering, cut off water and utilities, eventually forcing the occupiers to relent and leave. They could possibly assign a value to damages for lost access to the land and place liens on the occupier’s property, eventually siezing it to satisfy the damage claims. The cost of law enforcement monitoring and patrolling the situation could also be assessed. The last action the Feds want to take involves weapons and forcefully arresting these people.

9 Likes

I’m in favor of law enforcement just flat out killing these terrorists. Taking up arms directly against the government needs to be fatal. They are directly threatening lives. They should be fair game unless they immediately surrender their arms.

3 Likes

And their religion. Here is a simple guide.

Armed people take over a government building “to restore order” and threaten a bloodbath if the authorities react against them. These people are

  1. White = protesters with peaceful intentions (asserting their First, Second and Tenth Amendment rights), if perhaps not the proper means.
  2. A single white person = an isolated case.
  3. Black = playing the race card and disturbing the peace.
  4. Muslim = jihadist terrorists.
  5. Immigrated Muslims = foreign jihadist terrorists, allowed into the country by the Muslim in the White House. Immigration laws are too lax.
  6. Hispanic = illegal immigrants and/or drug cartels. Immigrations laws are too lax and we need a bigger wall at the Mexican border.
  7. Left wingers = un-American nuts.

That should cover most cases.

10 Likes

It really does seem that simple. Just cut off power, food and supplies and watch the clock.

4 Likes

Just send some Chicago cops up there to deal with,oh, wait, they aren’t black guys. Never mind.

7 Likes

Thugs. Noun: Black guys with guns.
Militia. Noun: White guys with guns.

11 Likes

Let’s not get overly dogmatic, eh? Were the students occupying University buildings during Viet Nam terrorists? How about the Occupy Now people… terrorists?

What they are doing is illegal… it seems to me the best solution is to have an open debate over use of Fed Lands and invite them to it. If they won’t go, it shows they don’t have a leg to stand on.

Were the students and Occupy Now people armed?

11 Likes

I’m not against killing the terrorists so much as mindful that federal agents and local deputies have families to go home to, and shouldn’t have their lives risked unnecessarily by poor command decisions.

I don’t grasp why the government is allowing reporters in or out. The solution is obvious. Declare the whole area closed and off limits. Cut the electricity. Cancel any and all cable, telephone, internet and/or satellite TV services. Turn off the cell towers. Turn away everyone who tries to enter and arrest everyone who tries to leave. Let the terrorists sit there in total isolation until their generator runs out of fuel. If the terrorists choose to open fire, shoot out their engine blocks and wait some more.

4 Likes

As long as they are getting coverage, perhaps we can make this ridiculous. Any civilian with a gun, toss bird seed at them to remind us all of the comedy they evoke.

How many protesting students or Occupy Now people were armed to the teeth and threatening 2nd amendment remedies?

These yahoos in Oregon are domestic terrorists, period.

10 Likes

Not “terrorists”. More like militants or insurgents. Terrorism isn’t a catch all term for political violence. If they start targeting civilians they will be terrorists. I agree they aren’t mere “protestors”.

2 Likes

Step 1: Seal the doors.

Step 2: Encase building in concrete, forming Derp-nobyl.

Step 3: Build new visitor’s center.

4 Likes

Alternate strategy: Bring back Janet Reno and deputize her to handle this shit.

4 Likes

“armed protestors” i.e. Terrorists!

Hey stupid terrorists, the guy you’re “protesting” for, already reported to the prison! Shows over, you didn’t change anything, go home!

This guy and junior, were poaching on federal (our) land, started a wildfire on federal (our) land to cover it up. Damn straight they both need 5 years in prison. More, in my opinion!

4 Likes

March through the streets demanding reformed policing policies as relates to the black population: Get tear gassed, thumped with batons, rounded up and some made examples of through arrest and jailing.

March onto Federal property, announce you’ve seized it, and anyone that doesn’t like it can go to hell: Get left alone for the most part.

Caucasians Rule!!!

6 Likes