Discussion: One Trump Tax Cut Was Meant to Help the Poor. A Billionaire Ended Up Winning Big

You can access it anytime you want:

2 Likes

They have President Donald Trumpā€™s 2017 tax overhaul law to thank.

Yep,Trumpian development that screws the community itā€™s located in, depends on loopholes for profits, ropes in outside investors to float the marginal margins, and is ultimately a large billboard for one manā€™s vanity.

The New Guilded Age

2 Likes

Had to look them up to be sure, but lemme just say: I donā€™t think so.

1 Like

If there were bullet proof Jockey shorts then Scott Pruitt would have bought them with his tactical pants and polos. :wink:

3 Likes

You havenā€™t missed anything. Overpriced shit, mostly. But then that defines a lot of stuff in the ā€œsports apparelā€ world.

1 Like

That isnā€™t the mapping error referred to in the story. Best to read the whole thing, but in a nutshell, the Treasury department used misaligned maps so thatā€™s how it Covington wound up making the cut.

1 Like

About a year ago I became aware of the company. Brand names are meaningless to me. Never bought them.

1 Like

Gilded Age 2.0

2 Likes

The wealthiest always win.

1 Like

Sounds like Governor Larry Hogan is typical of all republican office holders, a little on the shady side.

Wonder what kind of cut the governor gets out of this blatant graft.

On one hand, I sincerely miss the times when I could mock (AP) @squirreltown

On the other, itā€™s great to see pro publica articles popping up from time to time because I feel they are the best reporters and writing in journalism today.

1 Like

thatā€™s funny,I thought it was an auto body undercoat for paint - thanks for the info

put lulumon on that list with their sickening worship of ayn rand

1 Like

Good to know - not that Iā€™m buying any yoga togsā€¦

1 Like

not only are their products cheaply made and vastly overpriced, but they put out a tote bag with 'Where is John Galt"

just not my idea of how calming and harmonizing yoga is supposed to be

1 Like

My son got me into wearing UA. Iā€™d worn polyester polos before and hated them precisely because they were hydrophobic and didnā€™t wick sweat away ā€“ they left it on you. Breathability was hit-and-miss. Iā€™d long since given up on polyester and wore cotton. According to him, UA had a unique product for a while, until other makers figured out (a) there is a market for that stuff, and (b) how to make a hydrophilic polyester and weave the yarn loosely enough to be breathable but tightly enough to be durable. Then they were making it, too.

1 Like

Iā€™m fairly sure Patagonia, inter alia, had this stuff figured out some time before UA. Iā€™ve worn their (Patagoniaā€™s) base layers and some outer pieces for twenty years or so, ice climbing, and generally fooling around outdoors in all weathers, but especially cold, and have rarely been clammy cold from sweat build-up. Fifty years ago, hunting in early winters in Vermont wearing cotton ā€œthermal weaveā€ long johns I found out how useless that material can be if you work up any steam.

1 Like

For sure, Patagonia (and North Face, and probably Columbia) had the cold side of the equation figured out. Iā€™ve got a couple of North Face long-sleeve tees that are at least 15 years old. They are perfect outdoor base layers for the winter, and theyā€™ve worn like iron. Under Armour made their chops on the warm side. I suspect Plankā€™s genius was figuring out that those fabrics were useful in hot conditions (with lighter fabric weights).

Iā€™ve got some UA workout shirts that I wear as base layers in winter because in an office environment they work well ā€“ better than specific base layers intended for outdoors, in fact. I wouldnā€™t wear them outside in winter other than as a base layer, but under a Pendleton wool shirt they are perfect.

1 Like