Discussion for article #231487
The town does not “regulate displays for content,” Bickford assured WLWT.
Dixon’s fiancee, Amanda, told the news station that the nativity scene wasn’t meant to offend anyone’s religious beliefs.
Uh huh. Uh huh. Right.
Let this be a lesson for all. Once you start lying about Santa, it’s just a slippery slope for everyone.
First they came for the zombies…
But seriously, it has to be taken down the day after xmas? He can either do that or move all the stuff so it only takes up 34% of his front yard.
War on Zombie Christmas!!!
Shouldn’t zombie-themed displays be put out for Easter?
That’s what I’d do next.
See how far their “does not regulate displays for content” screed extends.
Zombie Baby Jesus in the pic?
Someone did a great job mocking that up.
The God whose tenets I follow?
Has a great sense of humor.
jw1
And, she’s black…
And BTW, Zombie Jesus looks suspiciously like the alien baby from the old tabloid covers.
Would not doubt that one whit.
jw1
“Rising from the Dead” not Christmas. Save your Zombie Jesus for Easter, moron.
Make it smaller. And fuck 'em.
Zombies aren’t real, right along with Jesus and Santa, so where’s the problem?
Ahhhh you beat me to it. Sorry for the post below.
“… Ohio has ordered one resident …”
Under conservatism, is government allowed to limit freedom in general or individuals in particular? I forget.
Could President Obama order a libertarian to fly the flag of Kenya?
We’re selective about our myths.
Beat me to it, too.
“…The structure takes up more than 35 percent of Dixon’s front yard…”
By the way, TPM, there are way too many issues here. I love this story.
Free speech.
That’s Moran.
well not buying the whole “zoning” thing.
really did somebody actually go into their yard and measure…then complain.
suuuure they did