You’ve made so very little progress in your 73 years.
6-3 Ruling,Written by Roberts, Is a Big Victory for Obama
There is 1:42 clip, that’s all you get. A transgender undocumented immigrant shouted rude stuff and got ejected. That’s the whole story with all its details.
I left that place in 2008. That is the worst pos website on the internet
Its not WHO he is, it is WHAT COLOR he is.
1 Like
This kind of protest is pointless, doesn’t work and only drives people from your mission. What did the idiot think was going happen? That Obama would stop the speech and free the prisoners?
1 Like
You are not alone. When the NYT published an article about Bill and Hillary and a story about Russia and Uranium which was a totality fictional allegation by Peter Schweitzer who has no credibility and even admitted there was no substantial basis for his allegations, was enough for me and proved they are just like the rest of the publications. That “corruption” meme is now a talking point for every republican. I had a woman tell me just the other day, how can you consider voting for HRC because she is corrupt. Even the NYT says so. Fuck the NYT
4 Likes
…in mom jeans!
3 Likes
It’s the old classic: If Obama walked on water, the Fox News headline would be:
OBAMA CANT SWIM!
Head over the today to see their take on today’s ACA ruling for a little humor.
Through Watergate, anyway. When Carter was elected, though, the press pretended he didn’t—couldn’t—matter, and piled on to every hateful meme out there. They became serious people, Washington insiders, and the ascendency of False Equivalency Journamalism snuffed out any attempt to avoid lockstep in promulgating the Authorized Version of Everything, delivering unto us the Era of Truthiness.
And there we are.
FIFT[hem]
2 Likes
Good reference.
If a link to NYT is good enough for Political Wire it should be good enough for you. Give it a rest
New York Times: “The Supreme Court’s decision was a clear victory for President Obama. But it was also quite good news for Republican presidential candidates. They can keep the issue as a rhetorical device to stoke support among primary and caucus voters, but they will not be burdened by Democratic criticism about millions of people losing health insurance.
Tell me what that means, I’ve never seen it, but *The Big Victory quote was in NYT headline.
Well, since FIFY means fixed it for you, I thought FIFT would be fixed it for them (them being the NYT). Never seen that in use, so I spelled it out.
I think President Obama and Jon Stewart are using the same writer.
Why the f**k hold back now? Tell it like it is.
The English language is a wonderful thing, can be revised, and added to, and always the possibility of neologisms. I love quoting NYT because it has brilliant writers and also because it annoys the troglodytes who dismiss it. Whatever.
Lol… I don’t think there’s a single thing that could possibly worry the pretty little heads of conservative Republicans, least of all the dreaded Democratic criticism.
I’ve been at WaPo coverage today, mostly the left leaning Op writers, and everybody’s thrilled and agrees that the SCOTUS decision is even good for the Rs who won’t have to pretend to be replacing it as NYT is also reporting. Jonathan Capehart wrote, If you like your Obamacare, you can keep it. However, Boner filed a lawsuit about Ocare about a year ago and the unilateral nature of the law, but that won’t surface until well into 2017. This president has his legacy on a par with FDR and LBJ.