Leave no grope unturned…
They would have needed some very specific information to get that subject into their warrant.
As if Trump needed another reason to find someone to bomb …
And the pee-pee tape would just be icing on the cake, so to speak.
Dotard actually prefers sprinkles on his, uh, cake…
Yellow icing, to be more specific…
I always knew that the basis of Trump’s relationship with the Russians most likely started with money laundering and a (Russian) cash infusion that brought him back from the brink of going completely broke. So nothing financial and sleazy surprises me. I am truly interested and a little lost as to where this investigation is going now. Mueller seems to be interested in things that would seem peripheral but clearly are not. Trump’s not only a terrible business man, he’s a terrible gangster, and even worse as President. What a mess.
Nurse, 5 kgs of popcorn. STAT!
They’re looking for “Access EVERYTHING” and I LUV it. It couldn’t happen to a nicer group of folks.
And where have you been flying?
One wonders what kind of acts related to 'suppressing" damaging information during a campaign could possibly constitute a federal crime. Sure, payoffs could be framed as illegal in kind campaign contributions, but that’s pretty thin soup to take to a federal judge when you’re asking for a warrant to grab the files and electronics of the personal attorney of the president of the United States.
And, specifically, one might be tempted to recall all the times potentially damaging information regarding Trump mysteriously receded from view in the face of threats of physical harm during the campaign, including the broad hints from Stormy Daniels lawyer and speculate wildly that they may have something to do with this.
You mean that tape that isn’t even Trump’s voice? Why would Cohen have anything about that?
And all The Apprentice out-take tapes.
And that’s it. No other embarrassing or illegal stuff. Well, there are those other 187 things. But, that’s all. Maybe.
[quote=“ncsteve, post:12, topic:70792”]
One wonders what kind of acts related to 'suppressing" damaging information during a campaign could possibly constitute a federal crime.
[/quote]Perhaps all those women being held captive in Cohen’s basement so as to be beyond the reach of the fake news media. And the Russian oligarchs playing cards in the den.
That’s a good question but I can’t think of anything besides payoffs which are construed as campaign contributions. However, Mueller is after something here - I don’t know what. I wish I did. My curiosity is killing me.
And a Cabernet drip.
I betcha it is tied into the Release of the Podesta emails and the timing . Did Trump and Co know the Access Hollywood tape was coming . Did they tell Wikileaks and Guccifer to pull the trigger on the release knowing through collusion they were there?
Inquiring Minds and Special Prosecutors want to know
Access Hollywood Tape comes out. Wikileaks drop happens closely thereafter, taking air away from the AHT story. Maybe getting AHT info means getting info about coordination of release of info?
I think I’ve seen that in the Heathrow Duty Free, next to the guy giving away free samples of Drambuie.