Discussion for article #233677
Well, this ought to provide wingnuts with a conundrum: advocate violence against the President while supporting ISIL?
5 Likes
Clearly this man has a career ahead of him as a Fox News White House correspondent.
4 Likes
cheerfully
St. Abdurasal the Armless, patron saint of cheery terror message boards.
5 Likes
This internets bring out the best in people.
4 Likes
This sounds like the scene in Borat where he was in the gun store asking whether a particular gun was good for shooting Jews. Are we confident this guy wasn’t just fucking with them for laughs?
2 Likes
No, but I’m pretty confident the guy isn’t laughing now.
4 Likes
So guys arrested for helping terrorists get the same amount of time for selling crack? How many things are wrong with that.
2 Likes
It sounds sarcastic… If it is, clearly, not something to joke about.
a citizen of citizen of Uzbekistan
Is that like being a citizen of Uz-beki-beki-beki-stan?
And since when has anyone in America had problems getting firearms?
4 Likes
See what Repub derp leads to?
Ya know, you read stuff like this and we have to wonder whether denying the feds access to the tools to find this out in advance really makes sense?
The Brits have access to all kinds of closed circuit tv (like the kind used to find the Boston marathon bombers), which we don’t want because of “privacy” interests. Makes you kind of wonder.
Yet there are gun grabbers who think this guy shouldn’t’ be allowed to carry a gun. Go figure.
1 Like
Agreed, the only thing I ask for is SERIOUS prosecution for feds and others who ABUSE their privileges. I’m all for that. But they do need to monitor internet activity and such, and it’s totally legal. I’ve posted many times that I smoke weed, and I’ll do it again now. Guess what, the feds are not seeing this post, and if they did, they could care less.
Yes, those CCTV’s are VERY useful for law enforcement. There is this impression that someone is constantly monitoring every camera and watching your every move. This is silly. They don’t have enough people to even remotely come close to doing that, even if they wanted to. But when something happens, access to those tapes is vital.
Let’s face it, we have access to all kinds of things we never had access to before. The notion that Law Enforcement should not have more access to makes no sense. Again, my thing is that more serious prosecution of people who abuse the privilege. If some FBI guy used the system to spy in his girlfriend, he should be fired and prosecuted.