Plausible deniability…
It cuts both ways…
This explanation doesn’t pass the smell test for me
The deletion of the Badlands’ tweets even prompted a new Twitter account, AltUSNatParkService, which does not appear to be affiliated with the National Parks Service in any way.
Really? How could anyone possibly tell the difference?
It’s time for everyone to pick a government department that Rethugliklans particularly hate — “We have several to choose from, folks. One to fit every lifestyle.” — and start a fake Twitter account, then flood the Titterverse will both real and fake information.
The GOP (professional haters of democracy and humanity in general) will be stuck trying to correct and deny so much information that they won’t have time to do anything else. It’s obvious they want to create as much chaos as possible. It’s only right that we do our part and help them out.
The Drumpfstapo are actively seeking the traitor to the Fatherland.
Theres also
Two thoughts:
- That actually sounds plausible.
- If I were running an agency that had gone rogue, that’s exactly the excuse that I would use.
a National Park Service official told TPM Wednesday
It was on the @BadlandsNPS feed Tuesday.
Three. Next time I will say we were hacked
4. After that, “a park volunteer had acccess to a device that was logged into the account”
5. Then “a grizzly bear did it, and there were no well-armed school children around to defend us. Help us, Betsy DeVos.”
Edit: automated formatting renumbers my list to start with 1 if stick a number at the start.
Haha…its like blaming it on the dead guy. Love it.
Twitter fraud. Brilliant!
Personally, I would have preferred the new twitter account to be “realNatParkSer” rather than AltNatParkSer, just to poke Trump in the eye a bit.