Discussion for article #228860
And he’s got a small dick, so…
His ugly goes all the way to his core.
When I spoke to God this morning, she said that this idiot would certainly know what sin looks like.
That was all I needed to know about him.
Holy fuck; this walking wart just can’t seem to realize that he’s the ugliest fucking piece of shit the teathuglicans can create.
For now anyway.
I think you just leveled the playing field, shit-for-brains.
. How lame of him to try to justify what he said by citing an article. Sure, looks may get you in the door, but I seriously doubt someone is going to voite for someone pretty if they start spouting stupid shit.And he not only stated how Kuster had a disadvantage, he followed up with stories of how she looks like a drag queen and is “ugly as sin”.
This guy should be ashamed of himself, particularly since I doubt he’d be a front runner in a handsome contest. But by all means I hope he keeps digging. Hell, I’ll hand him the shovel.
You just can’t fix stupid!
Has anyone but me noticed he closely resembles Jabba the Hut?
So what’s the explanation for this ass-ugly bastard’s electoral successes? The pervasive stupidity in these sorts of politicians and the voters that elect them is stunningly depressing. Sometimes I truly despair for the future of our nation.
Before he died, Gore Vidal said, when asked in an interview, that he believed that the United States would someday, sooner rather than later, have an authoritarian, fascist government. Looking at the Teabaggers, the Republicans, Fox News, and the various utterances of these sorts of politicians from across the nation (both national and local), I’ve come to believe Vidal was correct.
That this sort of moron can make such statements without fear of re-election, says a lot about American voters; none of it good.
It’s like that Fox commentator yesterday. The point isn’t whether or not there’s such an effect. The point is that this guy talked about the one candidate in an unbelievably obnoxious, churlish, hateful way. Civilized adults never talk that way in public and usually make an effort not to in private either. Of course, as noted yesterday, this guy’s only real claim to fame is lacking the filter that keeps most of us from saying flagrantly regrettable stuff.
Jabba the Butt.
Where do Republicans learn such wonderfully effective outreach?
Libtards FOrget The CarDINAL sins: WraTH, GreeD SLOth, PRide, Lust ENVy, GLUttony, and UGLY. EaCH is A FORm of IDOLTRy of SElf. For ExAMPle, “I’m GOING to EAt aND eaT aND worSHip FOod”. Or, “Look AT me, I"M HIDeoUSLY freekY fUGLY. VOTE for ME.” LIBtarDS SIN!!!1!11!!!one!!!1!!!
So how did this ugly fuck get elected? He would lose a beauty contest to a rusty manhole cover and yet he got elected. He must have been running against his wife.
From Wikipedia on Steve Vaillancourt, presented without comment:
He first ran for the New Hampshire House of Representatives in 1994 as a Democrat, but lost getting just 15% of the vote.[3] He ran again in 1996 and won the seat with 19% of the vote, sharing the district with Democrat Raymond Buckley and Republican Francis Riley.[4] In 1998, he won re-election with 20% of the vote.[5] In 2000, he won re-election as a Libertarian Party member with 18% of the vote.[6]
After redistricting, he decided not to run in 2002. He ran as a Republican in 2006, winning with 19% of the vote and sharing the seat with Democrats Michael Farley and Maureen Nagle. He won re-election in 2008 (19%),[7] 2010 (25%),[8] and 2012 (25%).[9]
cited an unknown study that found attractive candidates enjoy a significant advantage
Oy…Shouldn’t ugly Steve, then, explain his own election?
BTW-The Washington Examiner is a vanity pamphlet not a “legitimate paper” and any self-respecting canary should object to pooping on it.
If Rep. Steve Vaillancourt’s theory had any basis at all, then he would have had a naked mole rat as a challenger for his fugly’ face to win an election.
On second thought, the mole rat is still better looking…so, forget that analogy!! Perhaps a blob fish??? A ruptured hog’s backside???
“The media is spending too much time making up its own story to cover the real story, that a legitimate paper has reported that less attractive candidates can suffer as much as ten points,” he wrote.
Ahahahaha, enjoy your 10-point loss, you pig. I’ve seen YOUR picture, friend; you ain’t no Brad PItt yourself, Sparky. Thanks for doubling down on your ignorant, mysogynistic comment, you fool. Hope there’s an opening at your nearest McDonalds, you turd. That’s about as good a job as you deserve.
So, I’m guessing he’s expecting to start his next campaign at least 7% in the hole?
jw1