Too late!
That subscription has been cancelled for a long time now.
Too late!
That subscription has been cancelled for a long time now.
She also has LA Times and SF Chronicle, which was published several months ago which honestly was not impressive either.
I like that the editorial was written in positive language, i.e., why we should vote FOR her.
Itâs a great endorsement and it makes me really happy.
Itâs so discouraging to be constantly told what a lousy candidate the first woman nominated by a major party is; itâs so discouraging to be told over and over that nobody likes her. I know itâs not personal but as a woman it gets harder and harder to keep smiling when being whacked in the face with this constant refrain of everything in the world being wrong with our candidate and how sheâs running.
Will the WSJ actually endorse Trump? I find that hard to imagine actually.
Editorial and news are separate silos.
@tena
Just my uninformed opinion, but any editorial which does not take into account the missteps any given candidate has made is not doing its job. Itâs only far right and yes, far left, which donât touch on the mistakes and sometimes frailties a candidate has. Just so long as the endorsement is done with a positive outlook overall there shouldnât be a problem,
@kendyzdad No one seems to know that. They envision Maureen Dowd standing over everyone with a whip screaming âYou will obey!â
Not to judge by their editorial page lately - theyâve called him a liar straight up according to my husband who reads the WSJ.
I think it is personal, myself, since men just canât control themselves in needing to keep a woman down. Even many self-described liberal or âprogressiveâ men who pretend they have no problem with a woman doing X have their biases that often crop up: itâs not an exclusively right-winger, dominionist personality trait. This is how Trumpo, despite a record of bankruptcies, millions in debt to Deustche Bank and myriad other stuff, can be treated just as a âbusinessmanâ while Hillary appears to violate the known moral universe for being a woman who wants to be in the Oval Office.
Meanwhile, white supremacist garbage has gone mainstream and that is still not treated seriously at all.
I agree with your entire comment. I meant it wasnât personal to me but it has that affect on me as a woman. I think we mean the same thing.
Huh? What happened to all the clouds and shadows?
Oh, donât worry, theyâll be back. Hereâs some of their headlines from Nov 9:
âHillary Clinton elected; most disliked person ever to become president.â
âShadows continue to cloud Hillary Clinton as first woman is elected president.â
Remember: the Media Whores are like the leopard, and cannot change their spots.
Not this time around - the criticism has been just as heavy from the left as from the right and Iâm not talking about pointing out missteps. Iâm talking about this constant refrain of what sheâs doing wrong all the time that keeps her from having a bigger margin against HO, and the constant refrain that she isnât liked. That is a self-fulfilling prophecy - it feeds on itself and itâs really to me about the fact that she is the first woman in this position and she doesnât run like a man.
She runs our own style of campaign and apparently it just rubs a lot of men the wrong way for some reason.
âThe New York Times (ahem, cough, choke, gurgle, cough, spit) endorses âŚthat Clinton woman.â
They actually say a few nice things for a change. Time to exhume Vince Foster, et. al.
Check this one out
When the editor said they would start calling out Trumpâs lies, apparently he was extremely serious
Thatâs beautiful!!
Well clutch my pearls, Iâm getting the vapors!!
Wow, that was brutal! I canât believe I read that in The American Journal of Clouds & Shadows.
Praise for women in public life is rare, seems to be a knee jerk reaction to her simply being a woman and an extension of the kind of discrimination weâve all talked about here. âSmile, honey.â Everything Iâve ever read is that her circle of women friends adore her, think sheâs funny as hell, has a big robust laugh, and sheâs had to keep it in check because itâs not a manâs style.
The New York Post
The Wall Street Journal
National Geographic will break its tradition of never endorsing a candidate because Murdoch publications always become his political rags no matter how sacred their prior prestige and tradition.