Discussion: NAACP Cites Trump's Comments In Racial Discrimination Suit Against DHS

1 Like

Beautiful.

Donnie’s verbal / Tweet diarrhea comes back to haunt him.

6 Likes

This is turning out to be a pretty good day.

3 Likes

Homeland Security spokeswoman Katie Waldman said the court should be open to the “real possibility” that DT’s statement that all Haitians who came to the US in 2017 have AIDS and his vulgar language to question why the country needed more immigrants from Haiti were just jokes. It’s time for the courts to take DT seriously but not literally. SHS will be working closely with the DoJ on their reply brief.

1 Like

Let us remember that one of Trump’s favorite “heroes” is Andrew Jackson, infamous for introducing and gaining passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830 resulting in the forced removal of numerous Native American tribes from the Southeast to areas west of the Mississippi River, historically known as the “Trail of Tears.”

Seems that Trump is now trying to emulate his “hero.”

3 Likes

trump would like to make the same reply jackson did to court rulings against him, but he’s too much of a coward at heart.

1 Like

I think part of his claimed admiration for Andrew Jackson is that he fancies his Clairol Blonde Hair Helmet to impart a certain resemblance.

The other part might have to do with this song, which Draft Dodger Donald and his New York Military Academy classmates probably enjoyed.

1 Like

“Trump used vulgar language to question why the country needed more immigrants from Haiti or from African countries instead of from countries like Norway.”

1 Like

Great Job NAACP! The crooked administration is deserving of it, that’s for sure!

I am also wondering if a lawsuit can be filed on the fictitious Hassertt Rule that Paul Ryan is using to measure weather or not a VOTE to do the PEOPLE’s business will come forth for all reps to cast a VOTE on a bill! This FAkE Hassertt rule is in memory of a RepubliCANT rep who is now serving in a federal prison somewhere, I think. But more importantly this rule is used to NOT do business on behalf of tTHE PEOPLE that are being served in this country! This rule to me, is disruptive to our Democracy, it is also discriminatory and elitist as well and it has no place in our government. So it would be nice, if somehow THE PEOPLE could be given the opportunity to interject their thoughts on how Congress sets their rules to govern us! Cause this shit has got to come to an end and it is a practice that should be outlawed! PERIOD!!! FULL STOP!!!