Hey Muck Malarkey, do the world a favor. Have your mother apply for a retroactive abortion.
Any way his state can implement retro-active birth control?
Ok, Tom Price is NOT the most disgusting, heartless member of the Cabinet. I am a bit surprised.
Don’t watch the clip if you have any blood pressure problems.
Wow.
Your lack of compassion is exceptional even for a Republican.
Never known anyone who needed help?
It is my sincere hope that you might get hit by a bus.
its clear at this point this joke of a bill,is all about a win for Trump.
“No, they can try to change their own state legislatures and their state
laws,” he responded. “Why do we look to the federal government to try
and fix our local problems?”
Because is a national issue! NATIONAL! What part of the United States of America do you not get? These people are so fucking hideous.
So much winning it’s killing us.
Literally.
Reporters do ok, but they don’t ask fundamental questions.
Is health care a fundamental human right in the modern world, or not?
Should people be forced to petition their legislature if they have endemetriosis? Is that efficient?
Haribo building a factory in Wisconsin. 400’jobs in 2020! Wondering when Trump will take credit.
Death panels. Without the panels!
Of course he gets it. It’s part of the GOP playbook to claim everything is a state or local issue, except when it doesn’t suit their oligarchs or their authoritarian sensibilities.
“Now, now, pregnancy is much different in Real America, unlike where you live.”
Don’t like slavery?
“Then you can figure out a way to change the state that you live in,” Mulvaney replied.
We’re still fighting the Civil war. This is the way the Republicans think.
I know. I was venting.
And if they don’t have any bread to eat…
I know. For me, my blood pressure is more valuable than anything Team Trump says to Hannity, et al.
Imagine him in a clown suit or his underwear.
So can someone explain the difference between the state mandating and the federal gov. mandating? Government “intrusion” is government “intrusion.” Also if this lame brain gets his way they will sell across state lines so one can always buy an inferior policy.
So help me with this logic. What does it “cost” insurers to include maternity coverage for 60 year old women? What is the likelihood they will have to pay for maternity services for her? So if they are bearing no risk essentially that a 60 year old woman will use the benefit, why will it increase anyone’s premium?
So much for the party of “Life”. They don’t actually care at all about women, or their newborn babies, as this opinion makes clear. But the DO care greatly about maintaining control over her uterus, and her pesky sexual drive. Hypocrites.