Sorry Mueller, but this reeks of covering for your (same party) bossesâŚ
You owe the American people a more complete picture of what you spent 2 years investigatingâŚ
and answering questions before Congress is the least you owe us.
Yup, an utter nothingburger. Weâd best not rely on an ex-FBI head to save us.
Asks That Special Counselâs Report âSpeak For Itselfâ
Bullshit, make clear what you meant!
Mueller couldnât have been more clear when he said, âwe chose our words very carefully.â
Can he not still be subpoenaed?
Isnât he under less control by the president now? (As in, the president can no longer dictate that he not speak to congress)
âLengthyâ it was not.
Okay, Bob. Thanks for the help.
Coward. If being left out of the public debate was the most important thing to you, you shouldnât have taken the job. The country needs someone with the balls to stand behind their case and clear up the record. Go back under your rock.
if there was ever any question of the need for an impeachment inquiry, Mueller just answered it.
Mueller is not going to provide any additional information on his operation â the SOLE way that we will get that info is through an impeachment investigation.
Keep in mind that Mueller is a RepublicanâŚ
This is the way the probe ends
This is the way the probe ends
This is the way the probe ends
Not with a bang but a whimper
Relax. Heâs going to have to do that anyway.
He did pretty much what I thought he would. There are no outs here for the Dems. They either take the evidence he has provided and move on a formal impeachment inquiry or itâs Mitch McConnellâs âcase closedâ. I donât think thatâs a bad result. I want Dems to own this.
That speech was âsubstantialâ and âlengthyâ?
The actual question is, did Barr vet the speech before it was given? You know he did.
By all means, let the report âspeak for [REDACTED].â
"Speaking to reporters at the Justice Department, Mueller commented on the origin and nature of the probe, but asked that the public let the report written by his team âspeak for itself.â
Premise One: If we could exonerate him, we would have; we did not.
Premise Two: We cannot indict him; neither can we accuse him where he has no forum for rebuttal.
Premise Three: There are ten criminal acts in here.
Conclusion: If we COULD have indicted him, heâd be facing multiple counts.
Question: What part of this, exactly, is not clear?
Of course he did. An Mueller would have said so.
I didnât expect a bombshell, and we didnât get one. It seems to me that one of Muellerâs points was to show how unwilling he is to testify. That isnât great even if he eventually ends up doing so.