Confusing headline.
Some days the bear eats you.
Er, if he’s ADDING a new indictment, then “drops” is an unfortunate choice of words in the headline…
I’m seeing “drops” more and more as a slangy term for a debut or introduction of a new piece in the online world. This use seems like an extension of that.
Looks like they got Manafort’s IRS records. Trump too?
Don’t know. Guessing yes. 
Couldn’t have happened to a nicer couple of traitors.
Mueller can borrow Obama’s mic drop.
But his returns are still under audit so how can they be of any probative value until they’re finalized? 
So basically we have this:
Disadvantage of “drops”: Gives me a heart attack thinking Mueller’s case has fallen apart
Advantage of “drops”: Is “down” with the “street” or what have you
Seems to me that being unambiguous is better than being hip.
Please change the headline. It sounds as though the charges were dismissed. Change “drops” to “adds”.
Not 2017s they haven’t filed yet and that is while he has been our employee.
Perhaps TMP could say “Muller’s got the drop on Mnafort & Gates” ?
OT-But why are the same 4 John Judis pieces always listed in the Cafe? They have been on the front page of the website for a long time.
The headline almost made me soil myself. Change it, please!
I can deal with bad meaning good but this a slippery slope. I’m changing it.
Hey, at least the author didn’t say “Mueller put them on blast!”
I thought Gates was cooperating? If not what was all the hoopla over the lawyers?
Ok never mind the hipster headline and the subsequent heart attack y’all just had.
This ROCKS