In his case yes.
Prima facie evidence this jagoff has never read what Federal laws actually say or do.
LikE I SAID bEfore, WHites, EspeCIALLY whITE males, aRE gEtting A sMALLer PIECE of the PIE. FAct: 42 HOuse MEmbers Are Black, 28 ARE HISPANIOLO, 81 ARE woMEN, 7 Are HOMOgay, AND 28 arE AsIAns. THat MAKEs 169 OUt of 300 WhO are NOT real AMericaNS. SAVE America FROM the ILLEgal DEViants that MAKE up OVEr1/2 OF Congress!!!11!11!1one!!1!!111!!!
10 Likes
āā¦there is only one skin color that you can lawfully discriminate againstā¦ā
Thanks for keepinā the cat in the bag. Government really needs more guys like these old conservatives with sharp judgements.
2 Likes
Poor Mo - he forget the code words and said it out loud. His party is going to have to disown him or shut him up. Keep digging, Mo - that hole isnāt nearly deep enough.
1 Like
Eustace, whereās you been?
1 Like
The āDemocratic Partyā? Heās gonna lose his rwnj card. Rush told him itās Democrat Party (Demorat Party is also acceptable) or nothing.
1 Like
I love the smell of Republican whitesplaining in the evening.
2 Likes
76 or 77 trombones?
1 Like
Not to defend anything this guy said, but what you wrote is ridiculous, if for no other reason that we ALL have power over one another. If I refuse to eat at your restaurant because of your skin color, I have power over you and Iām discriminating against you. If I charge you more to fix your sink because of your skin color, I have power over you. It doesnāt matter which group Iām in. All that matters is that I have power as an individual and Iām using your race to discriminate against you.
Beyond that, weāre not solely judged based upon our race category, which is why there are some minorities who are more powerful than most white people. President Obama, for example, is more powerful than just about any white person in the world; yet is part of a minority group.
So even by your definition of needing power to discriminate, it still leaves open the idea that minorities can discriminate just as well as white people can.
2 Likes
āThis is a part of the war on whites thatās being launched by the Democratic Party.ā
Itās trueājust look at the NFL and the NBA. Itās obvious oppression of white people. Didnāt know that Donald Sterling was a Democrat, though.
2 Likes
To match his tiny brain and other white male part.
1 Like
Props for knowing the origin of ābeyond the Pale.ā
1 Like
the surface
1 Like
āBrooks initially made the remarks on Laura Ingrahamās radio show.ā
ā¦pretty good proof the right wing radio and TV spewing faces have created a milieu where no conservative can be interviewed without saying something so outrageous.
Ingrahamās unhinged white rage is hard to ignore. She looks and sounds sometimes as if she should be standing between Hitler and Goebels in some old 8mm home movieā¦
āItās repugnant to ever make an appeal based on race,ā he said.
Republican projection at its finest. Surely this fellow isnāt reaching out to ethnic voters is he? Or is he just trying to make his bigoted white constituents even more despicable than they already are?
1 Like
And everyone has to be homosexual on weekends and holidays.
1 Like
He obviously doesnāt understand what he reads. Yet he got elected to Congress.
Iām in the wrong line of work.
2 Likes
NFL and NBA war on whites? LOL
I remember when only white men played in the NBA and the NFL/AFL. They had to discriminate to accomplish it.
So, why, as soon as they opened it up for all races, did blacks dominate at so many positions?
So much for racial superiority.
1 Like
so white people are not covered by the law that makes it illegal to discriminate based on race, color, sex, religion or national origin?
1 Like
White women benefitted more from the anti-discrimination laws than all of the minorities put together. How this kind of talk or the immigration sharkanado is supposed to expand the GOP base is beyond comprehension.
2 Likes