Discussion for article #231331
(((Speechless)))
when a man âgives itâ to a woman, i believe she can do whatever she wants with âitâ. there has clearly been a transfer of ownership.
Read Margaret Atwoodâs âThe Handmaidâs Taleâ where women are forced to bear children and have no choice in the matter. No longer in the realm of science fictionâŚ
DID you GET Your HUSBand OR a MALE relaTIVE to APPROVE thIS EXtreMELY oFFEnsIVE anti-AMericaN cOMMENt. LIBtard CULTure of DEATH!!1!!!one!!11!!11!!!
Might as well make women slaves as in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia to name a couple. The south is great!!!
Read it many years ago.
Speechless. Do not know what to say. And Mitt Romneyâs wife claims there is no war on women.
Wait, Iâm not even allowed to not speak? Make up your frigginâ mind Republislug! Either Iâm supposed to sit passively and quietly while waiting for orders from my menfolk, or I can speak my mind and tell 'em to go F themselves when they demand a sammich! You canât have it both way youâŚyouâŚanti-woman polterghesty thing!!!11!!uno!!!
Missouri - the âblow-meâ state!
Hilarious when one thinks about how many women didnât vote and how many voted for the local GOP rep. Itâs happening all over the country - even the Supreme Court is telling women a corporation can control their health and well being.
âThat guy? No way heâs the fatherâŚâ How the hell would you enforce this? Examine the DNA from the fetus? Which would endanger the fetus? To protect the fetus? WTF?
Poeâs lawâll getcha every time.
Here we go again. (sigh) This clearly shows opposition to abortion is not about life ⌠itâs about men controlling female reproductive capacity.
I donât wonder that Republicans seem to think that regulation is what Democrats do because they hate business, because thatâs exactly the way they use it against any practice or entity they disapprove of â to try to regulate it out of existence.
To be fair this is entirely consistent with republican dogma. If you believe life begins at conception, then shouldnât the father have a chance to save his kidâs life?
Before you all start calling me Rush Limpaw, I am not pro-life. Just posing their rationale.
Until men can get pregnant, yes, itâs a false equivalency. Itâs her body, and she has the say as to what happens with it. If a guy doesnât want to get stuck paying child support, then he should keep it in his pants.
Absolutely. Itâs about that, and itâs about being able to shame a woman for her sexuality.
It occurs to me to ask: what does this bill say about a baby conceived as a result of rape? Does this mean the woman has to get the rapistâs permission before she can terminate the pregnancy?
And of course, there is the issue of an abusive spouse. If a woman wants to leave her abusive husband, and discovers that she is pregnant, then isnât this bill just giving that abuser tremendous power over that woman?
I will point out that the doofus/fascist behind this bill is also the same legislator who proposed giving equal time for the teaching of ¨intelligent design¨ and evolution.