Discussion for article #223507
Conservative outrage loading…
No doubt, if the First Lady is for it, they’re against it…even if it involves taking our vets off the streets and providing them some decent housing for serving our country. Their argument as usual will be lame and will go something like this…“We can’t afford it…it costs too much…the national debt will explode…argle-bargle…”
Of all issues to contend, one would think that caring for homeless veterans would be a unifier between left and right and not a divider. However, the GOP obstruction train has no brakes and madness is at the switch. In the end, this will hurt the GOP and help Democrats.
Late to the party Michelle? Go tend to your vegetable garden.
And if a pig had wings, you could fly. Who gives a shit? Do try to stay on topic.
This is off topic. Please do not post the same message over and over. These comment boards are not your personal activist message board.
You took the thoughts and words right out of my head and mouth
You are just so mean spirited. What is your problem?
Is Darcette off her meds again? Or just posting her usual derp about her Michelle envy?
Her husband - the day before - gets all kinda shit from the GOP for the prisoner swap and then hear comes Michelle with her concerns for homeless vets. Pick your spots better Michelle. That’s all I’m saying.
Michelle is the topic.
So wait. Are the GOTPers saying Obama is solely responsible for decades upon decades of veteran homelessness?
Give them a couple more days. It’ll happen.
Judging by the comments you left, one would think the topic was bed-wetting conservative snits. Also judging by your comments, you couldn’t care less about homeless vets–a very conservative frame of mind. Or did I misread you? Maybe you could confirm whether you support helping homeless vets, or at least defend why you think they should be ignored? You know, an on-topic comment. You seem somehow off today…did the expulsion of Chickfillay yesterday leave you reeling?