NBC is reporting Trump with a “strong lean” or some such folderol toward tougher sanctions.
And guess who" s out of the loop.Today’s WaPO:
So what’s the big deal? After all, how is a sheep supposed to look?
A new teaser trailer?
The wôrd:
“casus belli”
ETA. Holistic??? Where was the meeting? In fucking Sedona? Were there crystals, power pyramids, dream catchers and Yanni or Enya music?
ETA to the ETA. I thought that McMaster is supposed to be smart. I guess when you’re among idiots, even a high grade moron seems like a genius
Hair Furor is bound & determined to undo anything that black man did… and we’ll get a more unstable and a nuclear powder keg in the Middle East (beyond just Israel). The Saudis have the petro-bucks to build/buy nuclear weapons and will if the Iran deal gets dismantled… and BTW, Putin will be the one selling them the tech (like they were with Iran).
Iran should have learned in '53 that you can’t trust the US.
A lot of people are saying McMaster has taken to watching old “movies” in an effort to find some solace.
McMaster: Trump Will Take A More ‘Assholistic’ Approach To Iran
There. Fixed it…
Oh, man, the red dye no. 2 flowed like wine. Neoplasms all around!
There is something amazingly incoherent about the argument here. It is conceivable that the deal was poorly crafted because it gave them everything up front, while saving Iran’s part for later. But it would obviously make no sense to pull out of such a deal since what that means is that at this point we are getting more from the deal than Iran is.
The very criticism made of the deal makes clear how stupid it would be for us to pull out of the deal.
True that. Anybody working for Cockholster making mention of any nation’s “destabilizing behavior” may want to look in the mirror. (I would suggest reading a little history but that too is now considered FAKE NEWS!)
Very similar to the U.K.'s pulling out of the EU. The Brits were getting more out of the EU than most other EU countries. They kept their currency, for example.
Why do I trust Iran more than I trust Trump?
Why doesn’t he just give Iran a nuke, so he can start name calling – since that will be the outcome of breaking the deal?
Rocket man, so for Iran, “Warhead Wizir”?
Iran could trust Ronald Reagan to deliver up the weapons he promised for holding onto the hostages until after the election against Carter (the weapons traveled through Israel of all places). They parlayed that trust into another secret weapons sale by Reagan to help illegally fund the Contras.
It’s been said McMaster’s one of the adults but after this statement,
“The deal is fundamentally flawed. As the President said, he called it the ‘worst deal of all-time.’ It gave the Iranian regime all the benefits up front and then the incompleteness of the deal, the flaws of the deal, the sunset clause that could really give this regime who is not trustworthy, obviously, cover to advance a nuclear program and have a threshold capability,” he said.
IMHO McMaster’s been wraithed.
From Vanity Fair: WHY THE SCARIEST NUCLEAR THREAT MAY BE COMING FROM INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE,
At any rate, the serious risk in Iran wasn’t that the Iranians would secretly acquire a weapon. It was that the president of the United States would not understand his nuclear scientists’ reasoning about the unlikelihood of the Iranians’ obtaining a weapon, and that he would have the United States back away foolishly from the deal. Released from the complicated set of restrictions on its nuclear-power program, Iran would then build its bomb. It wasn’t enough to have the world’s finest forensic nuclear physicists. Our political leaders needed to be predisposed to listen to them and equipped to understand what they say.
Woof! Woof! Grrrrrrrrr.
Down, you mangy mutt.
What the holy fucking hell does this mean? He’s going to go stock up on holistic remedies at Whole Foods and ship em to NoKo?