Discussion: McConnell: 'There's No Evidence' That Voter Fraud Changed Election Outcome

1 Like

Cue the Twitrage from Trump. The Turtle will be the next target.

12 Likes

Then by all means let’s spend millions in voter ID laws all over the United States, you fucking wanker.

(I’m running out of curse words)

Edit:

We have had a series of significant cases in Kentucky over the years

Also, please define “significant.”

20 Likes

Nope, but there is evidence that voter suppression did. And will.

14 Likes

Oh FFS
Not “There was no voter fraud”
Just no evidence it changed the election.
Is there a sleazier politician on he planet?
I hate him with incandescent rage.

17 Likes

What voter fraud in KY? We show photo ID here to vote. Only fraud he’s talking about in KY is how the F he gets reelected.

20 Likes

Shorter Turtle: We must however keep up with Voter Suppression techniques to curb the imaginary voter fraud.

14 Likes

“I do want to point out, Joe, though, the democratic myth that voter fraud is a fiction is not true. We have had a series of significant cases in Kentucky over the years. There is voter fraud in the country.” (Bitch McConnell)

Citation, McConnell, citation?

15 Likes

“(I’m running out of curse words)”

There are never enough these days.

8 Likes

You mean, “No evidence yet,” McTurtle. And there won’t be any evidence if you and your fellow highbinders keep Congress from investigating Trump and the Russians.

8 Likes

“There’s no evidence that enough votes were stolen to change the outcome of the election,” McConnell said in an interview taped Tuesday for MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Welcome back Mitch

"I do want to point out, Joe, though, the democratic myth that voter fraud is a fiction is not true. We have had a series of significant cases in Kentucky over the years.

and this is where he should have been given at least ten minutes to name three of those cases.

There is voter fraud in the country. So the notion that something, for example, like photo I.D. at the polls is an effort to suppress the vote is patently absurd," he said. “But there’s no evidence that there was significant enough voter fraud to affect the outcome of the presidential election.”

…

fuck it

14 Likes

Citation? McTurtle’s repeated victories.

7 Likes

Shouldn’t the “journalist” have asked McConnell to cite the significant cases on which he based his statement?

9 Likes

The question is: how many 1000s of votes were simply tossed out in swing states such as North Carolina and Ohio? Would Trump have won if all votes were counted in a reasonable fashion?

Sorry, how silly of me. We do not ask these questions. The media narrative on election integrity is entirely focused on conservative mythology.

6 Likes

Well, we all knew that, that was just announced to keep our feeble little minds busy while Trump and associates were committing treason.

4 Likes

Signficant means “carried out by registered Goopers” – but we are certain this is significant because for every Gooper there must be 100-1000 times more Dems who are cheating. Proof, you say? We just know, that’s proof enough.

7 Likes

17 Likes

Perhaps we should have a paper trail so we corroborate each vote. Why would Republican party be against it?

3 Likes

BREAKING: Turtle Disputes Loon

9 Likes

“Pay no attention to the Russians behind the curtain.”

11 Likes