Discussion for article #238475
Yeah John, sounds familiar doesn’t it.
OMFG. This from the jerk who has spent years “firing up the crazies.” In fact, he chose one to be his veep candidate.
McCain…you started this mess by bringing Governor Sarah “Hatred” Palin onto the stage. You don’t get to complain.
Ironic…
OMG, crazies that might vote in his primary…
“We have a very extreme element within our Republican Party,” McCain
told the New Yorker. “We did to some degree regain control of the
Party.”
They are all yours John. YOU brought us a crazy your self, remember? I hope you enjoy what your party and Fox news has created. They are your party’s rotten albatross. Enjoy.
A lot of ( well most of) the crazies are in Phoenix 120 miles north of where I live. They think of McCain as a liberal.
Trump may be “firing them up,” but McCain unleashed them when he chose the Whore of Babble On as his running mate.
“Because what he did was he fired up the crazies."
I give you, Sen. John McCain [R-AZ], this year’s winner of the “Excellence in Critical Observation of the Self-Evident” award.
Un Frickin’ Believable, from the man who gave us cuckoo Palin. Unreal!!!
“People who otherwise might be more centrist are angry about this border situation," he said.
“People who otherwise might be more centrist are angry about this Black man in the White House situation," he said.
FIFY
When will someone tell this clown to STFU.
as usual… irony escapes the oblivious
Two words for you, you foul old man: Sarah Palin.
“Because what he did was he fired up the crazies."
And we all know that you can’t spell crazy without ®-AZ.
Starbursts, motherfucker. Trump is trolling the crazies you created, and you’re footing the bill.
Translation: The monster I helped create which has given me my whole career has escaped!
The name “Palin” is not mentioned once in this interview. Seems like the topic would naturally come up in any discussion with John McCain about the political dangers of firing up the crazies with demagoguery.
Does John McCain set a “no Palin” gag order when granting interviews? Sure, seems like it in this case.
It’d be like interviewing Paula Deen about diabetes, but failing to ask her about her history of promoting unhealthy foods.
(I actually had to double check to make sure this interview wasn’t part of the Borowitz Report. Poes’ law…)