Discussion for article #223542
I can imagine the look of terror on the candy barâs face right before it was consumed.
âOh, it hurtsâŚbut I kind of like it.â M&M candy while being licked by woman in commercial.
A least she stayed away from the brown acid.
Caption for Dowdâs selfie:
That damn Colorado pot made the right side of my head way too heavy. I finally know what the cool kids meant when they said âheavy, man!â back in the 1960s.
She wasnât paying attention, obviously. Kind of like how she doesnât pay attention every other day.
So, Mo liedâŚAgain⌠NO surprise at allâŚ
Hereâs the first rule of speaking to reporters. Make sure you have a recorder taping the conversation/interview and of course advise the reporter that the conversation/interview is being taped.
Reason why? Reporters/journalists are liars and you need to have the evidence of them lying.
âExtreme reactionâ? âWhether or not it was commonâ? Iâm not the expert but if you take 16 times the recommended amount of a recreational drug youâre likely to have an âextreme reaction,â I think it would indeed be âcommonâ for that to happen, seeing as how you didnât pay attention like an idiot and took a huge fucking overdose.
If anyone is predisposed to having a bad trip, itâs MoDo.
Hereâs a fun Alex Pareene piece about her perennial inaccuracy:
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/22/please_fire_maureen_dowd_or_get_her_a_fact_checker/
Iâve never read any of her columns, but Iâm given to understand that she IS a sort of silly person.
Um, Iâm a reporter and a journalist, and Iâm not a liar, never once been accused of it, and the very few who do make stuff up get their asses fired in short order. Itâs absolutely not tolerated. If youâve had a bad experience, which you donât say explicitly, then thatâs a shame. Reporters do make mistakes, about as often as car repair people, surgeons, and most of the rest of us do. Iâd strongly recommend that anyone talking to a reporter organize his or her thoughts, think of a few main points you want to make, and have a handout with the most important facts available to give the reporter if possible. And never let Maureen Dowd write about you.
Indeed. Ms âmarried to her jobâ is fortunate NOT to have a SO, because if she did they would dump her like yesterdays garbage.
âI reckoned that the fact that I was not a regular marijuana smoker made me more vulnerable, and that I should have known betterâ
Say it with me now:
Metabolism, metabolism, metabolism.
Well, Iâm STUNNEDâŚ
An NYT âreporterâ appears not to listen to her interview subject, intentionally ignores his information and does wants sheâs intended all alongâŚJudy? No, pot-crazed MoDo. Matt Brown should be happy MoDoob ate the candy when he wasnât near or sheâd have been on him like a cheap suit.
Gawd, watta puss.
Maureen Dowd is an idiot anyway.
Her âcolumnsâ in the NYT are nothing more than narcissistic ramblings of the âproblemsâ an âupper-class-geniusâ like HER faces trying to âliveâ in New York City.
They are nothing but: âSex in the Cityâ without the good looking one.
I know this is tin foil hat territory, but I wonder if the entire story could have been a creation in order to make legal cannabis look bad? That wouldnât be terribly unrealistic IMO.
Think about it, she conveniently has no witnesses as she chose to partake alone in a hotel room? That raises a huge flag right there.