Discussion for article #244028
So has he been granted bail, as the story implys; or is he being held without bail, as the headline implys.
He could’ve at least warned someone that these two were radicalizing and had bad intentions. Which he had also too with them at one time so denial won’t work.
I’m glad to see that I’m not the only one to have the same WTF? reaction to the story.
Paragraph 1: “… will remain in custody as he faces a terrorism-related charge, a judge ruled Monday”
Paragraph 12: “The judge agreed that Marquez poses a threat but found that he wasn’t a flight risk […] and his family was willing to put up $100,000 in equity on their home for bail.”
Ms. Myers, please try again.