Discussion: Kamala Harris Announces Run For President: 'I'm Very Excited About It'

I believe both will be in the mix.

“My entire career has been focused on keeping people safe."

And homeless.

Yeah, nothing would surprise me on that front.

2 Likes

Don’t get me wrong, it’s unfortunate, but it’s the reality of the situation. In 2016, the media gave PP all the exposure he could’ve possibly wanted. It SHOULD have hurt him, but it didn’t. It hurt Clinton and left people saying things like, “I never heard her talk about X issue” despite the fact that she’d talked about it numerous times.

5 Likes

Does this mean we will get a straight answer about why she kept Larry Wallace on for nearly two years after the California DOJ got sued for harassment because of his behavior?

Maybe I am not up to date on everything but all I have heard was that she didn’t know about it. I don’t know if that is true or not, or whether it’s worse if she didn’t. So far it doesn’t look like anybody got fired for not telling her about it when she hired him for her Senate staff about the time California settled for 400K.

She better have a path to 270 that doesn’t run through Minnesota.

I love Sherrod to bits, but please, please, let him decide not to run: the 2020 Senate map’s decent but far from a sure thing, and the way Ohio’s trending I suspect we couldn’t keep that seat without him. And I’ve been more skeptical of Hickenlooper since he flirted with a No-Labels run with Kasich.

At this early stage, I love Harris, like Klobuchar, and wish Warren were ten years younger…but I’m ecstatic that we’ve got serious women in the top tier, all of whom IMO are smart, personable, and capable of throwing a solid punch with a smile. This should be fun.

4 Likes

This is exactly why I won’t won’t support him in the primary if he does decide to run, and I hope he won’t. Had Cordray won the governorship, it would be a completely different story, but he didn’t. As much as I adore Sherrod, we just need him in the Senate a lot more than running for president.

5 Likes

That was my take-away from 2016 too. We need to nominate someone new and shiny with whom the political press can fall in love. If we nominate someone they believe they know, they will move straight to the “tear ‘em down” phase of the “build ‘em up and tear ‘em down” narrative arc.

1 Like

Exacta mundo! - Ohio’s gone cuckoo for Orange-Puff(the Vile President) and racist Repugnuts-

Brown has ridden the Blue-Collar sensibilities past its prime…that zeitgeist is so 2016!

Harris on the other hand, knows how to reconfigure the Obama Coalitions; a chunky portion of African American women(she’s a Howard University alumni); AOC inspired millennials and educated White Professionals(Polls are showing the last 2 sub-groups are trending her way)

California primary’s moved up! So she can afford to loose Iowa & NH to Elizabeth Warren and still catch a big wave, later in March…Watch that Woman!

3 Likes

Woman of color, I can already see the bites MAGA-nation is going to use with her.

1 Like

Kamala Harris is the ONLY Dem who is running or who might run for president who I can see on a global stage going up against Putin or MBS. They would be intimidated by her, which I think is important.
I think MANY of the candidates are great. They would be wonderful domestically in different ways.
But the world we live in now is so very different than it was before 2016 & we need a different leader. And we need someone who will be strong domestically and able to be TOUGH internationally.

They also must be internet savvy or knowledgeable. And able to deal w/ cyberwar & also our giant tech companies & the threats that they all potentially pose to us. (whether intentionally or not). Our next president will have to juggle rebuilding our country, assessing who our int’l allies & enemies are and how to deal w/ each…repairing or shifting relationships to fit the realities.

I don’t that Biden (who is great) has adapted to this new reality. Truly.

I have an open mind at this point…they ALL have to be vetted. Neither Trump nor Bernie were vetted last time…b/c everyone believed the conventional wisdom that Hillary would win (which she actually did)…

And let’s dump the horse race way of looking at this…it’s bad for making good decisions.

5 Likes

A lot will happen in the next 3 months …so who knows? Castro, Klobuchar, Warren…some of the ones ppl have mentioned I didn’t even know were thinking of running…and I think it’s great.

The woman from Hawaii seems like a troll. It’s fine w/ me if Bernie runs but he won’t be the candidate & I’d rather have him help turn out his ppl than turn them away like the last time.

We just need a 21st century candidate, not someone stuck in pre-2016 mode…really. We’re never going back there. I love Brown but his spiel sounds very pre-2016…

Beto should run for the other Senate seat. Gillum should challenge Rubio. And what are we doing about Maine and Kentucky senate races??? We have to start thinking about this now.

3 Likes

Totally fair, it’s a real consideration.

Might it also be fair to say we do less good in Ohio because we haven’t had a solid union guy like Sherrod on the national stage?

A solid union guy could help with the displaced forner manufacturing workforce come back toward the party. Could help Ohio, PA, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Just a thought, is one seat lost worth it for investment. Not saying I’m in this camp… just a thought exercise.

Discuss.

1 Like

Harris has some magic about her. Don’t ask me to quantify, but I just feel like there is something special about her at this time.

6 Likes

You’ll still get a Dem Senator though. A Senator from a swing state would be more risky.

Without knowing her entire career arc, she seems to have many of the intangibles. My impression is a smart, focused, and quite accomplished woman. If her skillset is perfect for the Senate, and doesn’t translate to President…I would wish her to stay put. Especially if it would be hard to get a Dem elected for her seat. But I doubt that is a problem and if she has the skills to handle the Presidency AND move the progressive ball forward I would gladly pull the lever.

Major bonus: I think she is just stunningly gorgeous. Very tele-photogenic. I don’t want that to be a prerequisite part of “presidential” but she doesn’t have a bad side. She already looks like some ancient classic marble sculpture. Makes it easier to get on Mt Rushmore. Looks can’t hurt.

3 Likes

Not sure why her gender is relevant. She’s the most electable candidate. That’s more important. There was so much fervor about Hillary being a female, the Dem’s forgot she was not good candidate. Concentrate on the candidate, not the gender. I find Harris and then Klobuchar to be the most electable candidates at the time due to…who they are. They are smart, engaging…they talk TO you. Hillary always seemed to be talking AT you. Plus Harris and Klubochar have good energy without being overly theatrical. I find Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Corey Booker to be a little too theatrical, not good for a Dem candidate either. Harris and Klobuchar have the most important thing that those others do not have. Centrist appeal. That wins elections.

3 Likes

I doubt it. And it means nothing if we don’t take back the Senate.

Awww, that’s just that Black Girl Magic.

9 Likes

Comes off as genuine, competent, and serious. Sh’s telegenic a good communicator.

She also the least easy of the bunch to caricature.

3 Likes