Discussion: Judge Won't Tolerate 'Game-Playing' By Neo-Nazi Site Founder Facing Lawsuits

“No one (expletive) believes this. It is statistically impossible.”

That was my exact response to the notion that a skinny, short neo-nazi is living in Lagos, Nigeria.

59 Likes

I think, that was the guy, Milos Y. described as being 5’ 2" in his manuscript ? Looks smart, too…

7 Likes

You can tell just from looking at this genius that he is one major-league mastermind.

20 Likes

Come on Judge, get into the 21st century. Game playing = trolling. Dude is trolling the court. Glad Anglin is being called on it.

That ‘travel documentation’ will be a hoot to read - guys like Anglin always think they are more clever than everyone else - and end up pulling bs that is so dumb that is almost inconceivable that they thought they could pull it off (analogous to Don Jr and his Russian antics/footsie playing - and his attempts to wriggle away from the inevitable call from Mueller).

16 Likes

Always amusing how inferior the “master race” types are.

45 Likes

“”“There are 2 million people in Columbus metro area. A process server happens by coincidence to run into me in a checkout line,” he wrote on his Gab account. “No one (expletive) believes this. It is statistically impossible.”""

Rationale and you don’t rationalize the truth. That approach is taken by folks with something to hide or are lying.

14 Likes

MAGA = Make American Germania Again

14 Likes

“There are 2 million people in Columbus metro area. A process server happens by coincidence to run into me in a checkout line,” he wrote on his Gab account. “No one (expletive) believes this. It is statistically impossible.”

Umm. No, it’s not, dipshit. And what the hell is with these jokers and their sudden infatuation with “statistics”? Roy Moore’s whackjob “election fraud expert” tries to prove the CIA (or someone) killed JFK using “statistical analysis”. I suppose they think it puts some stamp of certainty on their ravings. Jesus wept.

26 Likes

Nothing sums up the banality of evil more than being seen in Columbus, Ohio—a place best known for being the test ground for just about any crappy consumer product you can imagine.

14 Likes

@buckguy And the crap he’s trying to peddle is just about the crappiest of the crappy.

14 Likes

Annoy a judge this way and you can end up in jail. I know a guy it happened to. Doesn’t take much.

29 Likes

And the crap he’s trying to peddle is just about the crappiest of the crappy.

“It is difficult to sell a Neo Nazi Party, takes time, you have to adjust here and there to get it accepted”

4 Likes

On civil contempt. No recourse for appeal. The person stays in jail as long as the judge is on the bench.

19 Likes

such a Nazi Judge !

I hate to judge someone on appearance alone, but man… this guy looks a middle school kid who’s been stuffed into a locker one too many times.

32 Likes

just like how militia/sovereign citizen types believe a “notarized statement” is supposed to be definitive proof of anything. I don’t know if they still rely on this absurd tactic, but before the internet became a thing this was one of their favorite go-to maneuvers.

A notarized statement proves nothing other than that the person made the statement before a notary. There’s no consequence whatsoever for the statement being hilariously wrong. One can obtain a notarized statement that the Earth is flat or the moon is made of green cheese if one wishes.

19 Likes

I think Roy Moore’s wackjob stated there was a “one in 15 billion” chance that the AL Senate election outcome was free of fraud, or some such nonsense. 15 billion? Really? I suppose this might be possible if the standard is, “the results were 100 percent accurate without even a single miscounted, uncounted, or wrongfully-cast ballot.” Of course, one can say that about any election. The chances that Roy Moore actually won an election that he lost by 1.7% / 22,000 votes? About as close to zero as it gets.

8 Likes

Excuse me, what? Since when is it illegal to sue a stateless person for a wrong they have committed?

The residence of the person being sued ought to have no relevance to issues of jurisdiction. The only consideration should be where the tort was committed. In cases of cybercrime that is debatable, but “nowhere” is not an acceptable answer. For my part the tort was committed in Montana, where the victim resides, and thus the state courts of Montana or the federal courts of the United States have full jurisdiction depending on the statute cited for the lawsuit.

But I’m not a lawyer, so I’m sure one will come along and tell me why I’m stupid and why a self-proclaimed stateless person or, God help us, a “sovereign citizen”, can break laws and harm others with impunity.

3 Likes

IANAL but federal judges are assigned to districts and I am assuming it may be necessary to know whether this tool is in the federal district of the judge. Other procedural reasons? IDK…

2 Likes