Discussion for article #222797
It’s too bad Shitburner got his worthless ass banned. He’d be in here screaming with fury over this one.
But it would be HELPLESS fury.
[laugh, laugh, laugh, laugh]
2 Likes
How’s the DC very restrictive gun laws are working for you, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg? It looks like the more stringent they get, the more violence you get but hey, thick skulled people will never get it.
Largest Gun Study in the US concludes:
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301409?journalCode=ajph:
More Guns = More Violence
In Wash DC, gun-related deaths were under 100 for the first time in decades in 2012. Duh.
2 Likes
Has anyone checked to see how the guns feel about this? No one ever thinks of the guns. The sweet, sweet, guns…
1 Like
And yet, that’s not supported by facts. The states with the loosest gun laws tend to be the ones with the most gun violence.
Of course, D.C. isn’t a state, so perhaps cause and effect doesn’t apply there.
2 Likes
Re-igniting the gun control debate is a sure way to make Democrats losers in just about all rural areas. Guns may mean violence to urban voters, but they are a rite of passage everywhere else.
I doubt the members of the city government of Washington, D.C. give a rat’s ass about what helps Democrats with rural voters.
1 Like
Not sure all rural gun owners object to reasonable restrictions. Rites of passage that involve hunting don’t require assault weapons. Then again, right wing paranoia about losing access to guns gets a bigger hearing.
I did not say “all” rural voters object to gun control, just enough to make every Democrat that runs in their district lose to a Republican, particularly a Tea Party Republican ready and willing to stoke that fear and pander to it.
This is just one of the ways emoprogs will sabotage the midterms, and then sabotage Hillary’s run for President.