Discussion for article #235835
There are no constitutional or other legal precedents confirming that marriage, which is strictly a legal arrangement, must be a heterosexual union. Marriage, as some “clever” religious zealots are trying to argue, does not exist primarily as a procreative union. Current laws defining marriage this way are based entirely on Abrahamic religious tradition. Religious laws, at least in the West, do not trump civil laws.
2 Likes
I had never heard John Bursch’s voice until this clip. Hello, sailor?
Serious “Oh no he di-n’t” moment at the end of that clip. Does anyone know how Ginsburg responded?
Yes, “Hello, sailor”. John Bursch is sixty feet deep into his closet. Sorry and so sad you are fighting against your own rights.
Notorious RBG…she’s fierce!
(and as a side note…the guy in the bow tie must be a gay plant…who here thinks he is straight)