Discussion for article #239175
LOL
Youâre a fucking timid ass fool asshole punk.
Man up motherfucker and get in the fuckin game.
3 Likes
âNo, itâs not true. But I have said Mr. Trumpâs language is divisive,â he responded.
Now there should have been a follow up question to that, but because this is AmericaâŚ
http://johnford.net/wpblog/wp-content/uploads//2013/04/john-stewart-facepalm.png
1 Like
Tomorrow a JEB! spokesman will say the actual word was worse, but, yeah, he definitely trashed Trump.
This will be followed up on with a JEB! op-ed calling for a âreturn to civilityâ in political debate.
The same day, thereâll be an item in POLITICO, sourced anon, about what a deep holy person JEB! is BUT when his goatâs got, such as by Trump, heâs not above invoking classic Americana (âcckskerâ per the movie Bull Durham, âmthrfkckrâ to prove heâs familiar with idiom of the street.).
Needless to say, JEB! himself will, per tradition and in adherence with the format of what has by now become known as The JEB! Cycle, close out the Cycle by denying ever having said anything about anyone, ever.
1 Like
Yes, but its interesting to note that Trump responded in the closest thing to an impression of a statesman that he did all night. Almost like the whole thing was agreed to before handâŚBush gets an article printed about him that he is tough, yet gets to display that he is above the frayâŚTrump gets to feel like he was publicly apologized to, and gets to toss out just about his only âmoderateâ statement. One might even have called it a prepared statementâŚif one were of that frame of mind.
From the bigger perspective, Trump left Bush aloneâŚand vice versa.
4 Likes
I credit him for being slightly better on his feet than his brother, the ShrubâŚ
⌠but heâs still a weaselly, pasty-faced sack of sh*t⌠IMO
2 Likes
I wouldnât be that quick. JEB didnât receive any questions or comments tonight that were not entirely predictable. I mean, Kelly even asked him the same question that kicked off the firestorm a few months back about W and Iraq. The Bush campaign was clearly exerting their influence well before the cameras started. That question, and much of the debate, was scripted to make sure that Bush didnât have to think on his feet.
Who said anything about him âthinkinââ⌠
1 Like
JebBush: I also didnât call him a weasel lookinâ dickface, a smarmy pasty faced fuck or a womanizing trustfunder Daddyâs boy. I did say that heâs jacking up the master plan which makes me have to earn the nomination and that I hate him, but thatâs all.
I didnât say he was an asshole, I said he was asshole-ish.
Part and parcel with the Bush familyâs tradition of practicing viciousness behind the scenes and then using insider connections to paper over, minimize and lie when called on it.
This reminds me of Barbara Bush after the Vice-Presidential (GHWB vs. Ferraro) debate in 1984, Referring to Ferraro, Barbara Bush said âI canât stand that 4 million dollar, I canât say it, but it rhymes with ârichââ. When called on it, Bush said she did not mean to suggest that Ferraro was a âwitchâ. Like mother, like son.
The really funny thing about that episode came from Geoffrey Stokes, who wrote the Press Clips column in the mid-80s Village Voice. Every time he wrote about Barbara Bush for the rest of the campaign, he referred to her as Barbara âI canât say it but it rhymes with cocksuckerâ Bush.
2 Likes
Are you crazy, Jebbie? Thatâs the best thing you ever did, and youâre DENYING it?
Jeb Bush and Scott were losers in the debate. Both came off as weak and watery.