Give this woman a bonus equal to 100x her current salary! Oh, thatâs right, sheâs a woman and is valued at $.00 on the dollar.
So is she on the side of the angels or is she âcomplicitâ? I guess time will tellâŚ
The âNew Yorkâ wing seems to be on a winning streak over the conservative (crazy) wing.
Drumpf, who has come under fire for her apparent failure to moderate her fatherâs at times extreme presidency
at times?
Though I applaud Miss Richards for not falling in love with Ivankaâs glamour (like Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio), I wish that folks either tell Ivanka âno thanksâ or do as Richards did, while also remembering that Donald (not Ivanka) Trump is the 45th US President.
until then
âSenior staff at the White House, including Ivanka Trump, play an influential role in shaping the Administrationâs policy and negotiations with Congress, which has a profound impact on womenâs health and lives,â it added.
I cannot describe the amount of actual hate I have for her and her father. The sons are at best, minor idiots that the former two use to do their bidding. Ivanka wants to be the âliberal faceâ of authoritarianism and act very coy when confronted with the reality of the horror she complicitly aids
that remains to be seen (please remember who has final say)
Why do we know about this now? Is Bannon getting back at Kushner? Does the president need a reminder of what his voters feel about Planned Parenthood?
Kushner and his wife belong to the âKleptocraticâ wing of the White House as does the president himself. Donât make yourself any illusions about beautiful Ivanka being a force for good, remember that meeting with Al Gore?
When her dadâs impeached, I hope they throw all her (and Jaredâs) shit out onto the White House lawn, and change all the locks.
Enjoy it while it lasts, Ivanka.
âTrump herself responded to criticsâ charge that she was âcomplicitâ in her fatherâs administration on Tuesday by saying that, âIf being complicit is wanting to be a force of good and to make a positive impact, then Iâm complicit.â
But Ivanka your non actions are explicit.
Itâs interesting that this is coming out now. The thing is, Ivanka canât have it both ways. If she wants to be credited with promoting womenâs and family issues, she has to show some real effectiveness. If she prefers to be just a family member sharing her thoughts with her father behind the scenes, she canât then be paraded around as a sign of this administrationâs reasonableness. She seems to want to be viewed both ways depending upon the questions asked.
Congress could probably find a compromise on abortion that would pass both houses and garner Trumpâs signature. Maybe just making it illegal for white people would do the trick.
Unless the lust object has the ear of those cretins in the House who are in a position to make cuts to PP or the Senators who passed a PP defunding measure the other day, Cecile and others are wasting their time. Best just to donate as much and as often and volunteer for PP. Privileged thing has no soul.
Oh no. I have no illusions about the Trump clan. I donât expect anything will change regarding Trumpâs attitude towards PP, but donât want to be entirely cynical.
If the Trump camp leaked this story now, I wonder what the intent was.
Yes. And those times would be the entire time that he was president.
It more was likely the Bannon faction that leaked it, to get paleo-conservative donors like the Mercers upset with Trump.
I really think her role is more eye candy and to provide a female cover for Trump. He can parade his daughter around to prove he likes women and values women issues (much like the use of Ben Carson and Omarosa when he needs to show how much Black people love him). I doubt she has any affect on really anything as is shown with how Trump has Kushner running pretty much everything. Itâs odd because Ivanka is his blood yet Jared was chosen to be front man.
Trump, who has come under fire for her apparent failure to moderate her fatherâs at times extreme presidencyâŚ
Why? Who claimed that sheâs responsible for his actions?
Thatâs a great idea! And it might actually work. I would write my congresscritters about that. The paleo-conservatives donât really care about non-white fetii at all, (not that they care for non-colored children either).
The only possible drawback would be a noticeable enrollment increase of young black women at white evangelical churches.