Of course she told people years-ago, because Democrats typically time travel when creating their monolithic conspiracies.
A version of the Tardis that the deep-state black science ops loaned them.
Letās see what Avenatti drops on the plate today with another accuser. Heās got a pretty good track record of following through on his claims.
timewarp pipeline back to secure future Soros cash. Makes perfect sense.
If Democrats were able to go back to the sixties and place a birth announcement in a Hawaiian paper, they can easily go back a few years for this.
If all these supposed āfriendsā were REALLY told years ago, in confidence, of these events, I have no doubt - NO doubt - that they would have immediately reported them to the FBI. Why are we just learning all this now, hmmmmmm???
āOne of the conversations is preserved, in part, in an email exchange,ā
Well, there is some irony for you.
The emails! The emails!
Laughable comment. The FBI does not investigate domestic problems between couples, ever. And never will. That is local law enforcement responsibility.
Maybe so, but this is not the time to be creating suspense and teasing out stories. Out with it.
Is anyone else wondering what the pH of Bart OāKavanaughās stomach is now? Or if thereās going to be a Xanax shortage inside the Beltway as result of this shitshow?
So whenever a friend of yours tells you something in confidence, you go and file a police report or take it upon yourself to confront the perpetrator?
What part of āin confidenceā donāt you get?
Beacuse they were told āin confidenceā perhaps ? What part of āin confidenceā do you not understand ?
@trnc two souls, one thoughtā¦
Heād better have in this case, or heāll have really tarnished his brand. Iām glad heās able to beat Trump at his reality-show fatuousness, but really, itās still fatuous.
I think there are some defective irony meters in the response to your post. The second āNO doubtā kinda gives it away.
These letters are the kind of thing that investigators interested in finding out what really happened would want to follow up on.
Apologies. I should have added some sort of sarcasm indication.
Along with a commentary that itās disheartening that, looking back over my comment, what I thought was obvious over-the-top exaggeration of the kind of vitriol some people are throwing at Mrs. Blasey-Ford isnāt really exaggeration at all.
Sigh.
I lost the snark, Iām sorry, but the level of trolling Dr. Ford is exposed to makes me jumpy.
Yeah in these troubled times when you write something so perfectly in the voice of either a Russian bot or just a plain old Trump supporter use the snark.
FWIW (which isnāt much) I was pretty sure it was snark. The sad thing is that I was only pretty sure about it.
So this article has people saying kavanaugh wasnāt blackout drunk, he was the one who stayed at least somewhat sober while everyone around him got drunk. Which is a really convenient thing for a predator to do.