Discussion for article #223704
IOKIYAR. IYAD, it’s fatal.
These people are fuckin hicks.
And they wonder why they are losing voting women . . .
So just to be clear…
It’s horrible to have an ad featuring a baby chicken because the baby chick is a chick and that means it’s referring to Jodi
but it’s AOK for Jodi’s husband to call the former First Lady a “hag”.
Ummmkay.
But see, they’re the victims so it’s alright.
The people that they insult (single women) have lower voting rates. Many are MIllennials who don’t even follow this stuff.
The women who do vote Republican are, apparently, comfortable with those words.
That being said, they ARE losing some women. With the caveat that the old, bitter TeaBagg ones are coming out in droves.
Any comment from Reince Priebus? We all know how super serious he is about policing offensive humor on social media.
From the echoes of the comments I’m seeing, the wingnutosphere is already gearing up for eight years of Hillary Hate that will be every bit as delusional and intense as the Obama Hate. Pathetic mindslaves, the lot of them.
Only question in my mind is whether they’ll come around to “Obama wasn’t such a bad president after all. We just didn’t realize it until we had her to compare him to” they way they did with Bill.
He wakes up each morning next to “helmet head” Joni and Hillary’s the hag???!!
This is why I’m not particularly worried about this one. I expect there to be a lot of this kind of stuff and some big gaffes from the candidate herself. These people aren’t ready for prime time.
I think he’s probably used to waking up with castrated hog testicles in the bed, not unlike Jack Woltz in The Godfather.
Don’t count on “Obama wasn’t such a bad President after all”. I wouldn’t hold my breath.
Maybe because I was exposed to Ashley Montagu (“The Natural Superiority of Women”), I am more sanguine about Hillary and what she will face from the Rubes on the Right…
There will also be much more danger in calling Hillary a sexist name as opposed calling Obama a racist name–we colored folks are not as numerous as 53% of the population.
I hope that Republican women begin to show what they already know (and, as a result, take more control):
That TeaBagg men are really afraid of women (all women) anyway.
I suspect it’ll go something like this, “Even the most socialist president in US history, Obama, didn’t go this far.”
One of the many reasons I support Clinton for 2016 is because she’s the most electable candidate AND she’s the one person whose existence pisses off Republicans almost as much as Obama’s. So, when they’re vehemently opposing some measure in basically the same terms they opposed Obama, voters will be reminded that Republicans were against everything Obama said and did too, and will hopefully conclude the problem is Republicans.
Makes you realize how childish these people are,remember"Sticks and Stones ".
I see a distinct lack of Palin derp on today’s homepage.
This must be addressed. I shall be entertained, I say!
He’s named Gail, and he’s wearing mom jeans.
Hmmmm…
IOW you think he could be “playing catcher on Marcus Bachmann’s team,” wink wink, say no more, nudge nudge?
Gail Ernst needs to take a good, long look at his wife before rendering nasty comments.
thats why i call them DEMOWIMPS do they ever fight back the same problem exists in Kentucky and Georgia there are just afraid. again i will repeat this quote:
As a GOPer member of Congress explained some years ago, bipartisanship consists of the Democrats doing what the GOP tells them to do.