Discussion for article #227220
Just when you think the Whorington Pest canât stoop any lowerâŚ
it didnât take long for the hire to draw scrutiny, including from some who questioned why an ex-football player landed the fellowship instead of a young, aspiring journalist.
Right or wrong, thatâs how they roll over at HuffPo. Who doesnât know that already? Who in the world has managed to achieve a position in life in which his or her opinion on the hire is held in high regard, but s/he hasnât actually visited the HuffPo website?
As for the 9/11 stuff, the official story is garbage. There, I said it. Does that make me a âtrutherâ? Easy to dismiss, then. But, thatâs the point.
Yes, lets hire one of the few people who have actually KILLED an innocent person (Stallworth was driving drunk when he struck a pedestrian) and have him report on âŚnational security?
Taking away his drivers license automatically helps national security.
I follow Stallworth on Twitter, I actually didnât know he was a 9/11 truther but honestly it doesnât surprise me since he leans towards the anti-state power side. Ignore his football background, heâs actually really sharp and insightful and knowledgeable about global affairs. If not for the manslaughter incident (kind of a huge dealâŚ) heâd probably have a future in politics.
Statement from Arianna Stassinopoulou : âVell, dahlink, zis should get me some more airtime on the televisioning machine.â
Actually they revoked his license (for life, IIRC) as one of the conditions of his plea.
âGrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrâ
No, DonteâŚmore like âDerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrpâ
What parts do you consider the garbage âofficial storyâ? As an expert do you dismiss the effect of a jet on the building the size of the Pentagon? Because apparently this guy does.
Gave up on HuffPo years ago when I saw the tabloid trend happening. Nice to see theyâre continuing their slide towards irrelevance.
Iâd prefer not to turn this comment thread into that kind of discussion. But make no mistake, Iâm no expert.
Yeah, well, this guy apparently is. After all, he is certain that the âhole woulda been ASTRONOMICALLY bigger.â
Iâm sure thatâs based on all sorts of interesting facts and knowledge.
Donte,wasnât even a headline grabber as a player before his awful DUI /Manslaughter conviction,Interesting to say the least.
âcounter_coulter
Gave up on HuffPo years ago when I saw the tabloid trend happening. Nice to see theyâre continuing their slide towards irrelevance.â
TOUCHE!!
Itâs based on âan insatiable curiosity and a passion for politicsâ, you know, the qualities that make for a great journamalist.
Um, what the hell background does Stallworth have that makes him qualified to comment, as a journalist, on national security matters? I mean other than heâs a 9/11 Truther Twitter Troll. Anyone? Bueller?
The collapse of Building 7 is the smoking gun, showing that the destruction of the 3 buildings on 9/11 was done by controlled demolition. It appears that the Bush/Cheney gang orchestrated the 9/11 attacks so they could get their wars going in the Middle East.
Birtherism is easy to dismiss also. Whatâs your point?
We feel he brings a wealthy, pampered everymanâs perspective to the national security beat.
Not what weâre talking about here. Weâre talking about the level of expertise involved to determine how big of a hole a jet would make in the Pentagon.
Just. Stop. SeriouslyâŚ