Discussion for article #223867
You know, the way some trolling entities freak out and post ridiculous nonsense regarding Hillary Rodham Clinton makes it so very obvious that they are not at all liberal in the slightest. And they actually think they are going to impact Hillary’s presumed run for the White House in 2016.
#It’s laughable!
Pretending to hate Hillary for the right reasons, they falsely presume that the rest of us can’t see through their personal hysteria and aggravated Hillary Derangement Syndrome that
#They are terrified little shills
For them, a strong, capable, Democratic woman becoming POTUS, is a horror of nightmarish proportions. So they post old news, new sniveling and false narratives, hoping that somebody other than enlarged amygdala, woman-hating, micro encephalitic social midgets like themselves will vote for a Republican instead…
#Yeah, good luck with that.
1 Like
**
Ready for Oligarchy?
**
In related HillaryNews, her PAC is feebly attempting to squash the printing of terrible terrible t-shirts!
Pro-Hillary super-PAC in fight over ‘Ready for Oligarchy’ merchandise
A pro-Hillary Clinton super-PAC is facing a legal fight after trying to prevent shirts, mugs and bumper stickers that play on the group’s name.
Instead of “I’m Ready for Hillary,” a Minnesota activist made a line of shirts declaring “I’m Ready for Oligarchy,” in the same style and with the same font as the super-PAC’s images.
Ready for Hillary ordered two online sales sites, Zazzle.com and CafePress.com, to take those down, but that demand is coming under fire.
The consumer interest group Public Citizen is coming to the design creator’s defense, and accusing the super-PAC of trying to clamp down on his constitutional right to political protest.
In a letter to the group on Monday, attorney Paul Levy wrote that “critical speech directed at a candidate for president is squarely protected by the First Amendment, hence any application of trademark law to quash such uses is highly suspect.”
Stay classy, PUMAS!
So, I’ll ask you on this thread also…
Putting your overwhelming Hillary Derangement syndrome aside for a second, what candidate would you propose that has a greater that fifty per cent chance of ensuring that the White House does not fall into Republican hands nor that a Republican has an opportunity to add another Scalia, Thomas or Alito to the SCOTUS?
Try to be pragmatic with your answer, ideals are nice things but voting them can have severe consequences.
IMHO you’re in such a state over Hillary that you’re easily distracted and do not give much thought to consequences.
Either that or you seriously are a Republican or Tealiban under a false flag.
2 Likes
#Bingo!
1 Like
I note the lack of a response.
1 Like