Discussion for article #239324
(I feel the need)
THIS
IS
Why does this story make Trump seem refreshing?
I forget. Where exactly are we now on all of this? Hillary email-gate Benghazi stand-down order contained on Hillaryâs private server because birth certificate Benghazi Shillary and Shillary Benghazi Benghazi-gate death panel OMG ITâS THE SMOKING GUN!!! I SWEAR THIS TIME???
Something like that?
Iâd say itâs because Trumpâs antics are at least entertaining, whereasâlegitimate or notâthere always seems to be some âscandalâ surrounding Hillary and/or Bill Clinton.
I am glad she is doing it but why didnât she do it earlier on to avoid all the shit in between which dragged her reputation down. This was handled badly., I sure wish she would hire Obamaâs campaign staff.
McClatchy reported earlier Tuesday that the inspector general for the intelligence community had notified top members of Congress about two emails found on Clintonâs server that contained âtop secretâ material â more sensitive than was previously known.
Dear TPM, this is grossly misleading reporting. The same IG report you speak of actually recommended a reclassification of two documents to âtop secretâ that were forwarded to Hillary without a classified designation.
The Chicago Tribune reported yesterday
US Official: FBI Has Hillary Clinton Emails From Home Server
I couldnât agree more. Iâm really surprised at her handling of this â given her background and experience, I thought she would be one step ahead ⌠but it all makes me think sheâs probably hiding something. If so, not good.
Boring. Let me know when Hillary dons a slinky red dress, becomes the Gatekeeper, and then she and Keymaster Bill turn into devil dogs.
Exactly. The State Dept reiterated yesterday that none of this material was classified at the time⌠it was not marked confidential, let alone top secret, and circulated on non-secured servers. In fact, State still doesnât think itâs classified info (a classic turf war between Intelligence and State⌠and nothing intrinsically to do with Clinton).
Itâs the House GOP and their tame Intelligence IG who are saying it should now be marked top secret⌠and the media lazily says âshe had top secret documents on her server!â Despite the scare headlines, even many of the media stories had this fact right in the body of the article.
In other words, this is another GOP manufactured load of crap that the media is gleefully hyping.
Yes, she should have turned the server over in March and headed some of this off⌠but that doesnât excuse the ânarrative drivenâ media distortion, or their happy willingness to pass on GOP propaganda as fact.
Agree with previous that she shouldâve done this earlier. It was a stupid move by a stupid team that should be fired for its poor handling of the situation.
As it stands now, the delay only makes it look like she mightâve called in some professional to scrub these items out of the server/thumb drive.
Glad she did it now and not a year from now, but I suspect (as with all the previous âscandalsâ) that even a clean bill of health from the IG and any other agencies will be met with collusion accusations from the opposition. This wonât stop anything in the long run.
That said, if there were questionable e-mails sent out, wouldnât the possible recipients be able to help the opposition in its quest for these e-mails? Itâs not like she only sent them to herself.
I don;t believe for a minute sheâs hiding anything because if she were, she wouldnât be turning it over. It is just a bungling on her part. She did this in the 2008 campaign too,
Doesnât this site just piss you off. It does me. I am so sick of the misleading shit stories about her. If we canât get straight reporting from a so-called liberal website, where can we.
Thatâs what I heard. There were documents FORWARDED to Clinton. Hilary says she SENT no classified documents; opposition wants to twist that to include transactions in both directions.
And as you mention, making something classified after the fact doesnât make it so at the time.
chammy
I am glad she is doing it but why didnât she do it earlier
So far as I know, Hilary followed the law at the time. Just because some government person asks you for something doesnât make you obligated to comply.
This is meant as a genuine question, not a snark or a challenge; but, just what is, or what is the nature of, that which you think she is hiding?
Perhaps inadvertently you are playing by âClinton Rulesâ
- Everything, no matter how ludicrous-sounding, is worthy of a full investigation by federal agencies, Congress, the âvast right-wing conspiracy,â and mainstream media outlets
- Every allegation, no matter how ludicrous, is believable until it can be proven completely and utterly false. And even then, it keeps a life of its own in the conservative media world.
- The media assumes that Clinton is acting in bad faith until thereâs hard evidence otherwise.
- Everything is newsworthy because the Clintons are the equivalent of Americaâs royal family
- Everything she does is fake and calculated for maximum political benefit
Inevitable doesnât bungleâŚ
As Iâve said, HRCâs measured sounds like JEBâs measured.
I hope it is just a bungling on her campaignâs part. Iâm leaning toward that because, as you say: she wouldnât be turning it all over if there was something in there â but her bungling just leads her opponents to claim she somehow removed âevidenceâ that would incriminate her in whatever their bitch topic might be that day. I sincerely hope she learns from this and gets her act together from here on out.
I wouldnât say âpissedâ so much as âoccasionally annoyedâ. There will be times where, in the rush of getting out âbreaking newsâ, articles here will simply be a regurgitation of other agenciesâ articles without any sort of research or review of the validity of said article â especially if it fits a current narrative.
This is why Hillary is toast, buttered up and covered with sticky jam. She could have avoided all of this.
Now the GOP will be playing video of Hillary stating ââI believe I have met all of my responsibilities, and the server will remain private.â
Next will be the demands to recover the deleted emails under the guise of searching for more classified material. Investigators will either find and give the materials to Gowdy and Grassley or they will find out they have been completely wiped. If the deleted emails were professionally âwipedâ and are truly lost then it will appear Hillary really was hiding something. Both scenarios are bad.
This is not the same as what happened to Bill Clinton. Americans rallied to him because they had elected him and the hounding over sex was ugly.
Hillary is running for office and it is much easier for people to say âI donât need this headacheâ and simply walk away from a recurring case of Clinton fatigue.
Watch those trustworthy numbers crumble now.