Discussion: Hill Progressive Leaders Come Out Against Obama's AUMF: 'Too Broad'

Discussion for article #233240

How about these cowardly little dems and all repubs do the job they were elected to do…Fix the language and vote on it…They are all AFRAID to take a vote…Kick them all out for stupidity and cowardice!

3 Likes

This kind of shit is why I don’t self-identify as Democrat.

Yeah, I vote for them because I’ll take weak over evil, but I’m not gonna burden myself with their flaccidity.

1 Like

Which kind of shit, the progressive’s kind or the President’s?

This is very important and needs to be worked out and that should’ve happened long ago but it still needs to be done and done right.

Are you after war declarations or threats, what?

I think the President’s plan was broad intentionally, knowing that it would be gone over and adjusted and that that is as it should be. He isn’t supposed to be going this alone or even starting the damn bills. He is merely leading by example and the constant opposition has no understanding of such things.
So if the Prez goes pie in the sky, it leaves plenty of room to maneuver over, under and sideways to achieve the actual goal and to do this through the intent of our framers. You know, that constitution thingy.

Go Barack!

6 Likes

So, Speaker Boehner, the president you want to sue for executive overreach, who acts like a dictator and is crapping all over the Constitution, has now " tied his own hands and wants to tie his hands even further " ?

3 Likes

That was so last week Randy, what are you thinking?

But, keep it on hold because next week is a new week and the spin comes around pretty fast.

3 Likes

I’m a strong supporter of both the campaign against Daesh and the campaign against al Qaeda, and I find the Progressive Caucus’s position quite reasonable. They aren’t insisting on anything that would shut down either campaign, or even limit it beyond what the President has already said he intended to do.

Good for them.

Boehnor…isn’t it time to just call a spade a spade? Boehnor couldn’t care less about ISIS. He knows it poses no threat to the USA just as all his GOP’er buddies do. He want’s the ISIS issue and the opportunity to make political points from it.

Read his quote above. Is that consistent with a man that wants to go after ISIS and understands its the President’s job, with the help of Congress, to get that done? No its not. It’s a political jab. Because that’s all Boehnor is capable of. I haven’t seen a policy proposition from Boehnor in a long time. No one has. It’s all political quips and jabs from that man.

It’s an easy thing to do. Just listen to the American people.

No boots on the ground anywhere in the Middle East. Ever.

If they run from their own fight…we go home. We will help them. We will not do the entire thing for them.

Clean up is theirs. No American rebuilding or nation building.

We do it one time. Then it’s their baby. No matter how much it falls apart once placed in their hands we stay OUT. We don’t do seconds.

America will place it’s priorities and needs FIRST. We will not sacrifice the lives of our young people for an ungrateful or treacherous people. As soon as we are betrayed they get a fist in the face and they can keep their ISIS.

Religion and culture stay out of it. We are not there to ā€œunderstand their cultureā€ or to help them understand ours. Americans really don’t care about all that culture crap. Keep religion out of the way. They get one flub on that one and we are out.

That’s the only thing the American people want.

1 Like

The diehard progressives. Fuck 'em. They can be as unrealistic as the teatards on some issues.

ISIS is a real problem. It’s not a fake problem like Iraq was. It needs to be eradicated.

Really?

Spell out the language they think is workable to go after ISIL, al Qaeda, etc. we all agree should be targeted.

1 Like

Let me guess…the porridge will vacillate between ā€˜too hot’ and ā€˜too cold’ until a fermented mess explodes from the bowl?

OK, did they say that they don’t want to do that? The President’s proposal is too wide open and lacks some definition on key issues, he basically seems to be saying, here Congress, take the ball and run. The progressives will get input, naturally, and so will the teabagging right. At least the progressives have ideas based on reality and that fit in rather than just another twisted attempt to hurt Obama.

Yeah, upon occasion the hard right is also unrealistic but not about this, IMO.