Discussion for article #223101
“…McDaniel has denied any connection…”
Nonsense. “Birds of a feather.”
The next step in this process will be for friends and relatives to come forward and assure us of what good-hearted people these slimeballs are - faithful husbands, loving fathers, beloved in their communities, etc…
You mean like “birds of a feather” progressives? Guilt by association is a pretty dangerous precedent. I certainly would not like to be held responsible for ANY particular action of any particular progressive individual simply because we might hold similar political feelings. Perhaps I misread the intent of your post, but I think McDaniel is a disastrous choice as a candidate for many more substantial reasons than what some of his supporters did. IF there is any direct connection, show me the evidence and I will support full prosecution. Otherwise, work to defeat his candidacy based on his wrongheaded policy, not associations.
2 Likes
Oh, he absolutely is. You’re right about that.
I’m saying that regardless of the legal guilt or direct complicity anyone might be able to prove, the Republican Party needs to do a lot more in terms of keeping their mad dogs in hand, and I believe people “on both sides” need to be much more vocal about this.
I believe the “conservative movement” has become immoral and corrosive, and we’ll never stop it. Decent Republicans need to, and the longer they stay silent, then yes, the more complicit they become in the antics of their fans, their media, their ad agencies, their candidates, and their civil servants, even though the latter pretend and act like they don’t want to be.
I completely agree in working to vote in better representatives. Happy to say one of mine won recently. Thanks for a good point.
1 Like
I posted to the wrong reply button. Sorry. lol
I think there’s a joke here…
How many Tea Partiers does it take to photograph an old woman in a nursing home?
1 Like
lol… Easy. 10.
One to take the picture, and nine to hold a hearing “proving” liberals took it.
1 Like