Discussion for article #236154
For Geller to compare herself to Malala or Rosa Parks to me isâŠwell itâs offensive. Geller hasnât got near the courage of Malala and besides this beautiful young lady (Malala) is MUSLIM!! And supposedly Geller is anti-Muslim so on several levels Gellerâs off base.
And as for Rosa? JeebersâŠHereâs another person of great courage. Geller isnât worthy to tie Rosaâs shoes.
Geller is a pretty disgusting individual. And itâs probably true that she was looking to incite violence, which makes her both stupid and dangerous. But none of that really matters to me. Iâm not going to say, âI support free speech, butâŠâ Freedom of speech has value precisely because speech has the power to offend or anger. She wanted to make people angry. So what? People of all religions need to have their faith mocked.
Has anyone noticed that everyone that Geller has compared herself to has either been arrested, had to go into hiding or has been wounded or killed?
She is a racist haterâŠno wonder Hannity likes her.
She is exactly like themâŠexcept for the whole thing about agitating a group of people or pushing for their exclusion from the US society. The others fought or are fighting for inclusion. Expanded rights, so the only right she is fighting for is the right to exclude. Thus putting two ârightsâ at direct conflict.
Iâm really disappointed in Pam. She missed Mother Teresa, The Virgin Mary, Eleanor Roosevelt among others. Actually I think sheâs either trying out for a cheap cosmetic companyâs spokeswoman or as second runner-up in a J-Lo look-alike contest (with sincere apologies to J-Lo).
Please stop talking about this woman. Itâs so what she wants more than anything. Sheâs wretched. Thatâs all we need to know. Letâs move on please.
Letâs just compare her to Ted CruzâŠbecauseâŠwell, you know.
Sheâs a conservative. That makes her a born victim.
Geller, you do not fit among the Heroines you compare yourself too.
You see, you are nothing but a simple ass tea party hoe, who likes to suck on puny pricks!
Charlie Hebdo did not just do cartoons featuring Mohammed. They also did cartoons of the Pope, Jesus, the prophets of the old testament, and Israel⊠among many, many others.
If Gellerâs âcontestâ had also included cartoons of Jesus and Moses, then, okay, I would say she had a point comparing to Charlie Hebdo.
Victimhood is powerful! ⊠and often bathetic.
As an African American, I am very offended when white people use the N-word in a pejorative manner. What Geller did was akin to standing on street corner, yelling it, because she knew it would be offensive. That would be totally legal. It would also be illegal for a mob of black people to beat her to a pulp. I would criticize such a mob if they did that, and could even defend Gellerâs right to insult them. But I would also say she was an ignorant bigot who got what she deserved.
With free speech, comes responsibility. And with society comes the duty to respect other people. The Gellers of the world want the right to be offensive, without bearing the responsibility of repercussions from those she offends.
Is that little teeny narrow thing on her face a nose job nose? Just asking.
What? No Joan of Arc or William Wallace on the list.
They canât take away our FREEDUMB!!!
Sheâs pathetic.
What about Larry the Cable Guy? Has she tried that yet?
Activist Pam Geller Compares Well with Irma Grese and Ilse Koch.
Unaccountably, she neglects the two people she is most comparable to in recent history:
Streicher was hanged at Nuremberg in 1946 for crimes against humanity. Ley would probably also have been hanged except that he committed suicide before he could be brought to trial.
Being Jewish, youâd think that Geller would be aware of how closely her chosen career path parallels those of Streicher and Ley in as much as Geller would do for Muslims what Streicher and Ley did for Jews.
And weâre still talking about Pam Geller why exactly?