Discussion: Harris Shutters State Campaign Cmte. In Another Sign Of Her 2020 Intentions

Harris is 54 years old; she’ll be 56 in 2020. That seems to me to be around the right age to be running for President of the United States. Assuming the next president is a Democrat who serves for two terms, Harris wouldn’t be able to run until 2028, when she would be 64.

So, I have to disagree - I think now is the best time for Harris to run.


Edited to Add: By the way, here’s a list of our oldest presidents, those who took office over 60, by age:

Donald Trump - 70 years, 220 days
Ronald Reagan - 69 years, 349 days
W. H. Harrison - 68 years, 23 days
James Buchanan - 65 years, 315 days
G. H. W. Bush - 64 years, 222 days
Zachary Taylor - 64 years, 100 days

D. Eisenhower - 62 years, 98 days
Andrew Jackson - 61 years, 354 days
John Adams - 61 years, 125 days
Gerald Ford - 61 years, 26 days
Harry S. Truman - 60 years, 339 days

There’s a significantly strong drop in quality for presidents who take office at the age of 64 or older. Basically, they all sucked - and/or died early in office. Hell, poor old Bill Harrison didn’t even last a month.

So I don’t really care if it’s ageist, I’m reluctant to put anyone over 64 in that office.

3 Likes

It’s really not playing the “race card” (whatever that means) when you point out a phenomenon that has existed against a minority group for hundreds of years. White guys never get told to wait their turn. A prime example of this sits in the WH.

3 Likes

Or “step aside”.

2 Likes

I agree, but Clinton had that pedigree in 2016. Given most of the people the GOP has elected to be president for the past 50 years - Nixon, Reagan, Bush the Younger, Trump - ridiculousness appears to be a trait Republicans favor.

I don’t disagree, but I think she only did among Democrats. I guess what I mean, to be more exact, is someone whose ability to inspire others will readily and obviously exceed his ability to (somehow) inspire a tiny, dumb segment of the population – someone more Obama than Clinton.

1 Like

What I said was that she played the “race card” card, injecting a racial component into a legitimate discussion of, regardless of his race, whether Obama had enough experience to be president. And I think a white guy with the amount of experience Obama had in 2008 would have been told, implicitly if not explicitly, to wait his turn.

(& @zillacop) Haven’t seen her View appearance, but she was on Pod Save America more than a year ago; smart, no bs, and lots of fun:
https://crooked.com/podcast/think-globalist-act-localist/

I’ll be doing my homework on everyone in the already-promising Dem field, but she’s my early favorite. Love her.

And btw, @pluckyinky, just a quibble, because I’m touchy about it: Kamala was definitely a powerhouse in CA, but Obama’s IL record was more impressive than even many of his supporters gave him credit for… /nerdout

1 Like

Thanks for all the replies…good, reasoned arguments. I like Harris myself and would have no problem supporting her, I just don’t want to see her run, get lost or seriously shot down, and not be viable in the future. I think she has a lot to offer wherever she is serving.

Usually for me it’s a matter of picking the least dreadful candidate. This year there is an embarrassment of riches. Deciding is going to be really difficult.

She’d be foolish not to pursue it … she has fairly widespread support, near as I can tell. No on wants to be the front-runner now anyway.