Merrick Garland: Yup!
Lindsey Graham Cracker
Boy, that was one impressive argument.
No, dipstick, that ended when Republican’ts refused to hold hearings for Merrick Garland. But hey! Why let the truth get in the way of a good story?
McCain: Nunes 'Killed' Any Chance Of Bipartisan House
Probe Into Russia
No Lindsey …
It’s shit like this that kills bipartisanship in the broader sense —
“Graham: Dem Filibuster Of Gorsuch Would Mark ‘End Of Bipartisanship On Judges’”
That ended when you fuckers blocked Garland, shitheel.
Fuck you.
That’s all.
p.s.
Oh, and fuck you.
The Republicans declared war a long time ago. Finally, maybe, the Democrats will fight back.
I’d actually be interested to know what Roberts thinks of all this. A seat on SCOTUS has become nothing more than a chew toy for the Senate.
“We’re not going to have a rule, a tradition in the Senate where they get their judges and President Trump can’t get his,” he said.
Remember this next time he seems reasonable.
With a chainsaw slowly, Senator Graham. Although I admire your pluck in saying that with a straight face.
“We’re not going to have a rule, a tradition in the Senate where they get their judges and President Trump can’t get his, . . .”
Memories may be short, but not that short.
Revisionist history does not work in the day and age of computers , the Garland nomination and fiasco that ensued ended all bipartisanship in government. The republiCONz have no one to blame but themselves.
It’s amazing how Republicans can utter the most hypocritically ironic statements without even the slightest indication they’re remotely aware of what they’re saying.
That, or this is typical Republican spin designed to bamboozle Democrats yet again into believing that these poor Republicans are just misunderstood patriots.
That ended last year when the GOP refused to even hold private meetings with Merrick Garland, much less committee hearings or a vote.
Oh, Miss Lindsey, you’re such a dope. Bipartisanship on Judges was killed by you and your Republican colleagues when you refused to even consider Merrick Garland. FOAD!
In true Repub fashion, Graham posits an argument that is weak, selective, and therefore faulty. One could argue that Merrick suffered the longest filibuster in history.
I was going to post that the treatment of Garland ended bipartisanship, but I see that point has been made several times.
So, all I can say is: Motherfuck the motherfucking motherfucker Graham.
Miss Lindsay… your party had a 60 vote threshold for everything under the sun. The supreme court justice was spared the Reid change, because you all were just digging in for the sake of obstructing. To hear you mouth this dribble makes me despise the republican party more than ever. All of you.