Discussion for article #230270
So many words just to say, âIâm a coward.â
Gee, I dunno â it takes a brave man to deny justice to Michael Brownâs family by refusing to appoint a special prosecutor for crass political purposes. Of course, he wonât be going to Ferguson to face the crowds personally.
âTin soldiers and Nixon cominââŚâ
Gee, that question sure sent the Governor into a tailspin
Okay, no doubt that itâs a lousy, clumsy answerâŚ
But honestly, if I were asked such a question, Iâd have probably said something like: âWhat exactly do you mean âthe buck stops hereâ?â
It would be insane to say that any public official can take full responsibility for whatever mayhem large groups of protesters + police/National Guard might create. So if he says âyes,â supposedly heâs to blame for anything anyone does? Thatâs crazy.
If he says ânoâ then it sounds like he isnât taking the situation (and his responsibility) seriously enough. Itâs a no-win question.
That said, he still shouldâve been ready for loaded questions,
and not appear like he hasnât thought about itâŚmakes him look like a fool.
Letâs just hope that cooler heads prevail after the decision,
and no innocent blood is shedâŚ
Just keep a perspective on where that phrase originatedâŚwith Harry Truman, a Missouri icon.
Given that background, the answer for any Missouri governor or even a candidate for governor is pretty easy and very shortâŚâyes, it stops at my deskâ
One helluva public speaker!
âAMAZINGâ âINCREDIBLEâ I canât decide which one.
Maybe itâs just me, but this piece smacks a bit of tabloid journalism, with a bit of hyperbole in the headline.
I think that an important thing to note here is that the bulk of the violence in Ferguson is as a direct result of the local police rioting.
The violence is, and has been, a police riot.
If you start with that, the best solution is to use the national guard to make sure that the local police are confined in their barracks.