We can’t defeat ISIS unless we say the exact words:
Wise man: When you removed the book from the cradle, did you speak the words?
Ash: Yeah, basically.
Wise man: Did you speak the exact words?
Ash: Look, maybe I didn’t say every tiny syllable, no. But basically I said them, yeah.
They miss the point completely. “Jihad” is a sacred concept to practicing Muslims- it does not mean holy war, it means “struggle.” Usage of this term loosely would be akin to a racist extremist Christian calling a lynching “crucifixtion” or eating spam as a "Eucharist. "
It’s not that hard to grasp why this verbiage is inadvisable. Even to an infidel agnostic such as myself.
“Global Jihadism” sure sounds a lot like 43s “Global War on Terrorism”. Now will sessions grant the orange douche the same powers woo did for 43 in forming the basis for unilateral executive authority?
Were looking at a repeat of the failed unilateral foreign policy of bush /cheney that created ISIL. Thing is i dont think theres enough americans willing to repeat the failures of the 41 and 43 middle east policy or commit there children, or family members to fighting in the interest of the defense and oil industry…at least i hope thats it…
Completely unrelated to this other than the “most important” part. I heard a couple co-workers talking about the big stock market surge today. And I was thinking about all the folks bragging on Dubya when the markets almost reached where they’d been when he took office right before they fell off the cliff. It will be interesting to overhear what they say when it tanks on Trump. I’m thinking that will happen shortly after he implements something, it goes for a bit, and people realize it’s not actually helping anything.
No he couldn’t; none of them could. They look like a lineup getting ready to be tried at Nuremberg - all of them. Put Gorka next to Miller and Bannon and that is enough to make anyone want to run screaming right the hell out of the USA.
Yes, DOW hits 21K. (+350pts-ish). I read some investors’ comments and the overall consensus seems to be that the speech lacked details (which is correct).
Granted, the economic indicators released today overall suggest solid fundamentals, but what do those investors specifically like about the speech (if the speech is any reason for this market surge)… it’s beyond me.
The beginning part of Josh’s post is just killing me.
Plenty of observers say that President Trump’s first speech to Congress last night was a major reset, a game changer, maybe even the moment when he “became the President of the United States.”